“Keep it simple’; that’s my motto. “The best solution is a simple one.” I’ve been called “direct”, “to the point”, “succinct” and then I’ve been called bad names. But all-in-all, I know my style and that is to, if you’ll pardon yet another cliche, “cut to the chase”. So, when I read the article ‘Lawrence Auster, Muslim immigration, and emails’ at Jihad Watch, I had to laugh. Here was Robert Spencer in a tug-of-war over the same basic principles, but all a discussion of how to say it. Semantics, boys and girls. Don’t ya just love ‘em?
Spencer states:
The blogger Lawrence Auster has been criticizing me for quite some time for not coming out against Muslim immigration. Yet when he has articulated his position in more detail, it is remarkably similar to mine: he even mentions, in the last post I linked, the immigration application questionnaire that I have been working on for almost a year now and about which I have held discussions with several Congressmen. As for illegal immigration, I am opposed to it across the board, and as for monitoring mosques, I have called for it repeatedly — see, for example, this article from March 2003.
I’ve had some disagreements with Spencer before myself, so I can relate to the fact that Auster is being critical on some points, but let’s just make it clear — the point here should be bloody obvious by now, eh?: Islam BAAAAAAAAAD medicine.
I’m starting to wonder if all I have to do to gain web traffic is become another complicator of otherwise obvious and simple solutions. I’ll stick to my methods and see what happens instead. Here are a few of my quotables from the past three years:
- Outlaw Islam.
- Truth, not Islam.
- Islam is the Enemy.
If you can’t make the point in four words or less, then the point isn’t worth making. And you can quote me on that one, too.
Of course Islamic immigration should be completely halted. Of course Muslims in the USA should be forced to leave if they are not citizens. Of course citizens of the USA that are Muslim should be entering their cult into a Reformation or becoming apostates.
And, of course, none of it is happening.
We live in a nation crippled by political dogma, overcomplexity, the IRS, cell phones and other poisons that warp our outlook on reality. When did life get this complicated that we no longer have common sense — that we have to go buy a book on the New York Times Bestsellers list in order to finally get ‘the point’?
How I wish for the ‘good old days’ when Americans reacted in plain-spoken English and with grit and determination; when we stood together as a people in the face of our enemies instead of having to deal with seditionists that tell us it is “our right to criticize” while they are funding more campaigns of lies and dissent in order to fill their political coffers. The trouble here is that those ‘good old days’ were before I was even born, that’s how long its been since this nation has made much sense.
So, let me try to leave you today with one more clear thought to blow away the cobwebs of time and hopefully get a few more of you onboard the train of simple, brutally common sense:
‘Islamic Bombs or Victory?’
Have a nice day.
Podcasts Archive
Keeping anything simple in this day and age is almost impossible-even when it happens it gets lost in the shuffle. WW2 was a simple business-name the enemy, pound the enemy, accept surrender from the enemy. No euphemisms, no opposing viewpoints, no worries of collateral damage-here’s the task and let’s accomplish it ASAP. So simple, but applying that mentality today is hopeless. We can thank the 1960’s for this-freedom without responsibility, PC, doubts about America and mindless nihilism has given us over 40 years of confusion, decay and decline. Unless a countercultural revolution happens the US as we have known it will be finished before the end of this century.
[quote post=”429″]Keeping anything simple in this day and age is almost impossible-even when it happens it gets lost in the shuffle.[/quote]
Perhaps, but I’ll take my chances and keep tapping the hammer until the Big One hits. Grim resolve in the face of overwhelming odds? Not always a losing battle.
The Anglo-Zulu War of 1879 - Isandlwana and Rorke’s Drift