JihadWatcher

 


More proof the Dems want failure in Iraq

Nancy Pelosi
A New York Post editorial red flags Democrat ambitions for failure in Iraq:

THE SPEAKER DOTH PROTEST

February 23, 2007 – Vice President Dick Cheney has House Speaker Nancy Pelosi in a snit.

At a news conference in her hometown of San Francisco, Pelosi claimed that Cheney had questioned her patriotism: “I’m going to call the president and tell him I disapprove of what the vice president said . . .”

So what exactly did Cheney say?

The veep was responding to last week’s House vote disapproving of President Bush’s “surge” strategy - and the words of Pelosi’s boon buddy, Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.), to left-wing supporters that the vote was a “first step” toward essentially defunding the troops.

“I think in fact if we were to do what Speaker Pelosi and Congressman Murtha are suggesting, all we’ll do is validate the al Qaeda strategy,” said the vice president. “The al Qaeda strategy is to break the will of the American people.”

Cheney, sad to say, spoke the truth.

After all, it was Murtha who told the anti-war Web site MoveCongress.org that the Democratic intention is to derail Bush’s plan to control Baghdad.

In linking the $93.4 billion spending bill for Afghanistan and Iraq to a series of impossible-to-meet conditions on the training, equipping and resting of troops, Murtha was clear about his real goal: “They won’t have the equipment, they don’t have the training - and they won’t be able to do the work.”

How can that not be interpreted as a blatant attempt to undermine the president and the troops in the field - thus, as Cheney said, “break[ing] the will of the American people” by dooming the overall Iraq mission to failure?

Hard to argue with that.

Pelosi is upset?

Well, the truth sometimes hurts.

Your tax dollars go into the pockets of people like Murtha and Pelosi. Gives you a nice warm feeling, doesn’t it?

 


 

Related Posts
   
FOEHAMMER'S ANVIL

4 Responses to “More proof the Dems want failure in Iraq”


  1. 1 Jane B. Drake  | country flag 
      
    Feb 23rd, 2007 at 12:52 pm

    One of the numberless surveys conducted these days reports that 52% of the people in the western world (not just the U.S.) think the issue with Muslims is political and can be resolved peacefully; 29% think it is a religious problem.

    I am part of the minority because diplomacy, whether conducted by Democrats or Republicans, can never settle the religious differences that are driving us toward disaster. If nothing changes, we’re going to have a nuclear war simply because:

    1) The “fanatic Muslims” won’t care whether Republicans or Democrats run the United States! When they are ready, they WILL use nuclear weapons against “Islam’s enemies,” which they perceive as “God’s enemies.”

    2) The “fanatic Muslims” will use those weapons because they devoutly believe they will be doing “God’s Will,” by cleansing the earth of “unbelievers.”

    The dark, cold “nuclear winter” that will follow a “nuclear war” will fulfill the Biblical descriptions of a time when “…the sun will be darkened and the moon will not give its light” (Matt. 24:29); when “…darkness shall cover the earth, and gross darkness the peoples” (Isa. 60:2).

    If, however, you don’t believe in Prophets and prophecies, you certainly don’t have to think about them — until the darkness happens. Then, if you’ve survived, you’ll have plenty of time to think. Until then, go ahead and blame Republicans, Democrats, Muslims, Jews, Israel, Iran, Syria, or anyone else that strikes your fancy — except yourself! After all, what could you have done to prevent the war? Obviously, the “fanatic Muslims” have no right to expect you to alter your religious beliefs or unbelief. Besides, you have no reason to reconsider, much less discuss, your personal beliefs with anyone. You’re not forcing others to agree with you and you don’t want others to force you. You just want to live and let live, and you’re sure everyone should do the same.

    Because, today, “everyone” doesn’t believe in “live and let live,” I’ll suggest what you could have done, so you can think about it in the darkness. You could have learned how to turn your heart to others, as the Prophet Malachi plainly said we must do, to avoid the darkness (Mal. 3:24/4:6). But, to honestly “turn your heart” to the “crazy Muslims,” you will first need to turn your heart to the One God revealed by ALL the Prophets of Judaism, Christianity and Islam. You’ll be desperately praying to Someone in the “gross darkness” — why not try learning about the God Who foretold it? If enough of us enlarged our understanding of Him, we wouldn’t have to suffer the darkness!

    So, whether you’re a Democrat, Republican, or someone in another nation “rooting for” a particular political party to win control over the “dangerously aggressive” United States, it’s time to carefully question whatever you believe and disbelieve. Then, you could finally do what you’ve never done before: Learn from ALL the Prophets sent to enlighten and warn you. Their COMBINED teachings would greatly enlarge your understanding of the God Who, long ago, precisely told us what our stubborn ignorance would bring upon us! An enlarged understanding of Him would deprive the “fanatic Muslims” of their crucially-needed certainty that you are an “unbeliever.”

  2. 2 Foehammer  | country flag 
      
    Feb 23rd, 2007 at 2:12 pm

    Interesting perspective. Thanks for commenting, Jane. I’ve linked your blog.

  3. 3 Jane B. Drake  | country flag 
      
    Feb 26th, 2007 at 1:15 pm

    Thanks for the link, Foehammer. I’ll reciprocate.

  1. 1 Is the Far Left really the New Fascist Party of America? « Foehammer’s Anvil Pingback on Feb 25th, 2007 at 12:07 pm

Leave a Reply

Quicktags:

WMD means weapons of ____ destruction.

Note: This post is over 3 years old. You may want to check later in this blog to see if there is new information relevant to your comment.

DISCLAIMER: The comments in response to articles here are entirely the property of the respondents in question and these comments do not necessarily reflect the views or opinons of Foehammer or Foehammer's Anvil. Vulgar, off-topic and otherwise trivial commentary may be edited or removed without notice. Some comments may be automatically held for approval, filtered or otherwise delayed.



 

Twitter


Full RSS Feed

Click to add Foehammer's RSS feed

Foehammer presents:

'Refuting Islam'
An Anvil Original Click to watch the video

Alex Jones

Recent Comments

  • Foehammer: The CIA generates millions, possibly billions of dollars each year through illicit drug...

  •  
  • Foehammer: So, you trust the Federal Government. I see. What else do I need to add?

  •  
  • Steve Harkonnen: I’ve known a few folk to fall off the edge like this, but I’d hope that...

  •  
  • Foehammer: I’ve studied Islam. I know exactly what it teaches as its main priority — the spread...

  •  
  • Muhammad Elijah: Ban it all! If you don’t want your family “westernized”: Sir, with all due respect,...

  •  
  • Muhammad Elijah: In my humble opinion, the easiest way to Ban islam, would be to get it’s legal...

  •  
  • Foehammer: There is a reason you know of to give George W. Bush a free pass without a proper investigation?...

  •  
  • Sam Deakins: Is a 911 truther. At least Scott Brown does not believe GW Bush had a hand in the killing of...

  •  
  • Foehammer: Go with your motherly instincts and good information on this, Kim. I’m so sorry to hear...

  •  
  • kim: Thank you for posting this~ My son has autism. I firmly believe it is from the 7 (YES SEVEN!!) shots...

  •  
  • Foehammer: The implosion-by-design is being helped along by Federal Govt. that is increasing in size during...

  •  
  • houseing help: The financial crisis that occurred didn’t seem right and a lot of money was lost...

  •  

Rand Paul for U.S. Senate
Peter Schiff for U.S. Senate
9/11 Health Now
Architects & Engineers for 9-11 Truth
Get Thunderbird!

RSS Entries and RSS Comments 179 queries. 3.3650 seconds.

Follow me