Comments on: “Nothing to fear” from ‘extremist’ school bus drivers says the FBI http://foehammer.net/2007/03/nothing-to-fear-from-extremist-school-bus-drivers-says-the-fbi.html Anti-NWO, Anti-Islamofascism, Anti-Islam, Pro-West, Pro-USA: Helping spread politically incorrect truth before the demise of Western Civilization becomes a reality. Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:41:16 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1 by: Geoff http://foehammer.net/2007/03/nothing-to-fear-from-extremist-school-bus-drivers-says-the-fbi.html#comment-2861 Thu, 22 Mar 2007 17:03:04 +0000 http://foehammer.net/2007/03/nothing-to-fear-from-extremist-school-bus-drivers-says-the-fbi.html#comment-2861 Here is the problem. The onus is on the government (federal for policy but ultimately local for enforcement and preparedness) to ensure our communities and populations are safe. It is why we have public officials in the first place. If I spot a known child molester driving a school bus or on school grounds, I am alerting authorities and expecting action to be taken to ensure that the event does not repeat itself. I also expect public notification as to what actions have been taken or will be taken. Background checks are mandatory, are they not? I went through an extensive background check in order to teach children at my church so that the organization may stay above reproach in light of unfortunate priestly activity in recent years. So then why would we expect anything different when our children are threatened by known extremists who have expressed interest in harming “America” through her children and have proven (Beslan) they have the means to do so? My wife refuses to sign a friggin’ field trip permission slip for my 6 year old and I can’t honestly assure her there is no legitimate risk taken by him to ride a bus. Responsible parties should absolutely have been prosecuted or at the very least fired for the unnecessary debacle that was 9/11. Thanks to Jamie Gorelick and friends in the infinite wisdom that was the Clinton administration deeming it best that the CIA and FBI (right hand/left hand) should not be privy to each others operations, here we are today. There IS someone comforted by the FBI and its statements of denial regarding our safety and security and it is NOT the public they are sworn to protect and serve. No indeed it is the very extremists themselves that are comforted by these words. Thanks but no thanks. In the future, just come clean with the truth and involve the public. Your concerns about mass hysteria are unfounded and this country is mature enough to handle such things. I need another drink… Here is the problem. The onus is on the government (federal for policy but ultimately local for enforcement and preparedness) to ensure our communities and populations are safe. It is why we have public officials in the first place.

If I spot a known child molester driving a school bus or on school grounds, I am alerting authorities and expecting action to be taken to ensure that the event does not repeat itself. I also expect public notification as to what actions have been taken or will be taken. Background checks are mandatory, are they not? I went through an extensive background check in order to teach children at my church so that the organization may stay above reproach in light of unfortunate priestly activity in recent years.

So then why would we expect anything different when our children are threatened by known extremists who have expressed interest in harming “America” through her children and have proven (Beslan) they have the means to do so? My wife refuses to sign a friggin’ field trip permission slip for my 6 year old and I can’t honestly assure her there is no legitimate risk taken by him to ride a bus.

Responsible parties should absolutely have been prosecuted or at the very least fired for the unnecessary debacle that was 9/11. Thanks to Jamie Gorelick and friends in the infinite wisdom that was the Clinton administration deeming it best that the CIA and FBI (right hand/left hand) should not be privy to each others operations, here we are today.

There IS someone comforted by the FBI and its statements of denial regarding our safety and security and it is NOT the public they are sworn to protect and serve. No indeed it is the very extremists themselves that are comforted by these words. Thanks but no thanks. In the future, just come clean with the truth and involve the public. Your concerns about mass hysteria are unfounded and this country is mature enough to handle such things.

I need another drink…

]]> by: ISLAMSFORLOSERS http://foehammer.net/2007/03/nothing-to-fear-from-extremist-school-bus-drivers-says-the-fbi.html#comment-2558 Thu, 22 Mar 2007 02:13:10 +0000 http://foehammer.net/2007/03/nothing-to-fear-from-extremist-school-bus-drivers-says-the-fbi.html#comment-2558 Insane! We're to look for suspicious things but everything is fine-no threats to us at all. What the hell's wrong with the FBI-are they trying to get into the comedy business? Time for the 64 dollar question: Why are those with ties to extremist groups allowed to drive school buses? Better yet-why aren't they being thrown out of the country? This world is making less sense to me every day. Insane! We’re to look for suspicious things but everything is fine-no threats to us at all. What the hell’s wrong with the FBI-are they trying to get into the comedy business?

Time for the 64 dollar question: Why are those with ties to extremist groups allowed to drive school buses? Better yet-why aren’t they being thrown out of the country?

This world is making less sense to me every day.

]]> by: DP111 http://foehammer.net/2007/03/nothing-to-fear-from-extremist-school-bus-drivers-says-the-fbi.html#comment-2503 Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:47:17 +0000 http://foehammer.net/2007/03/nothing-to-fear-from-extremist-school-bus-drivers-says-the-fbi.html#comment-2503 <b>“Parents and children have nothing to fear.”</b> Then why the alert? And again, who are we looking for? Suspicious looking Norwegian grannies, suspicious looking Buddhist monks? If we cannot profile or even the name the enemy five years plus after 9/11, who the hell are we looking for? “Parents and children have nothing to fear.”

Then why the alert?

And again, who are we looking for? Suspicious looking Norwegian grannies, suspicious looking Buddhist monks? If we cannot profile or even the name the enemy five years plus after 9/11, who the hell are we looking for?

]]>