Oh, to hell with it; I’m too impatient. I couldn’t wait until next week to start retaliating for the obvious censorship of my ideas by Digg, so here we go then. Under a brand new category of its own, I now present to you the start of the real deal, gentle readers: the ‘Boycott Islam’ Campaign.
Beginning today I will be creating original buttons, posters, t-shirts, etc. all with this same basic mantra: Boycott Islam
Simple, clear and incredibly politically incorrect, I think it just might catch on. I’d love to hear opinions and suggestions as this whole monster gets on its feet and starts running.
For today I created this:
Simple text-only button. Copy this HTML for use in your email, web page or anywhere else HTML can go:
This “button” is actually nothing more than HTML code styled with CSS. This means it loads lightning fast, needs absolutely no formatting by any webmaster that copies and pastes it and it links back here to the Anvil. Nifty, eh? You may use it anywhere HTML works for you. If you wish to edit the URLs to lead to your own site and market the campaign also, feel free to do that, too.
Over the coming days and weeks I will create fancier stuff. I even have a “music video” in the works.
Digg, you just ignited the Civil Disobedience against Islam and the threat of Sharia. Congratulations. (Hat-tip: Henry David Thoreau)
WHAT STARTED THIS?: How to peacefully remove Muslims from your own neighborhood
UPDATE: Added a Boycott Islam page to my main menu. This will serve as a constant resource until the campaign ends.
Podcasts Archive
Foehammer, be ready for the wrath of the “witless”!
Let the “witless” come, but without this story being Dugg, I’m sure it won’t be nearly the locust swarm it could be.
Anyway, I’m armed and ready:
I am in and I will help spread the word. I added your idea to my site and asked readers to stop by.
Regards,
Ronin
Foehammer,
I’ve added that “button” to my right sidebar, very near the top. In just a minute, I’ll do a post to call attention to the button and to your story.
Terrific. Please note that I updated the button a few minutes ago. For those that have to copy/paste again, my apologies.
I’ll have fancier stuff to choose from in the coming days and weeks, too.
I’m seeing vast potential in this idea…perhaps this is exactly what Digg feared.
Foehammer. I just put your little green Boycott Islam button on my blog. You’re right, it’s time to take off the gloves and go on the attack. I’d like to see a resurrection of the old Viet Nam Phoenix Program on a global scale directed at the Jihadi.
@songdongnigh: Blogrolled you. Welcome aboard.
Another idea: a campaign to get small towns to declare Muslims personae non grata for safety reasons. If the Leftists can agitate for Sanctuary Cities, then the Vast Right Wing Islamophobic Lobby can damn well agitate for Muslim-free towns.
I would like to see this on all the ‘blogs that are connected in this common cause/war/resistance.
Added. Not only do I have a normal link to your site, I have a boycott link as well!
It’s Fatwa Friday, so I better watch out now!
@Chris: Glad you support the campaign.
Found this blog today, and decided to wake up my (sort of) new but sleeping blog. Translated and added two short articles from a Dutch source. Added both a normal and a boycot link to this blog. Keep up the good work!
Apologies in advance for this, and if you want to pull it, that’s fine - but here’s the latest from the UK.
You might want to put this up as a full post:
Off topic, but vitally important for us to know.
http://haddock-somethingfishy.blogspot.com/2007/07/scary.html
“” Scary ?
from Daily Telegraph letters page today;
Ethnic Border Guards
Sir - There are certainly very serious questions to be asked about the manning, mission and effectiveness of the Border and Immigration Agency of the Home Office, previously the Immigration and Nationality Directorate (Letters, July 5). It says its role is “securing our borders, enforcing our immigration laws and managing migration to the benefit of the UK”. Its catastrophic failure to perform these functions correctly is plain for all to see.
When I said to a previous Home Secretary that the controls at our ports of entry were “beacons of political correctness”, he replied that I had made a demeaning remark. I therefore asked the Home Office what proportion of its staff in the various immigration, identity and passport services were from ethnic minorities.
Given that ethnic minorities are estimated to form about 6.7 per cent of our total population of working age, I was alarmed to receive the reply that, of those staff whose ethnicity was recorded, 29 per cent of the Immigration and Nationality Directorate, 30 per cent of the Immigration Service and 14 per cent of the Identity and Passport Service were from ethnic minorities.
While it is only right and proper that all law-abiding bona fide citizens, regardless of ethnicity, should have equal opportunities, the manning of our front-line immigration services is curiously disproportionate. It does not promote confidence in the agencies responsible for the control of our borders and therefore the security and integrity of our nation.
Geoffrey Van Orden MEP, Conservative Defence and Security Spokesman, Brussels “”
[[SHM adds: Note: “of those staff whose ethnicity was recorded …” - so how high is the actual number in these departments?
The government CAN’T be doing this out of sheer incompetence. No one, not even this bunch could be that incompetent. They MUST have an agenda.
How many jihadis are getting through that even the intelligence services and police don’t know about? THIS IS SERIOUS STUFF!… we need to know]]
Go have a read, with Captain Haddock’s usual pithy comment added on.
I’ll be back soon to post something I read in “fredoneverything” that is very relevant to those of our point of view.
PS I think our countries, people and cultures are being betrayed by our leadership - knowingly.
http://www.fredoneverything.net/index.html
This is nearly two years old, but it is a valid today and into the future as it was then. It’s ageless.
I think Mr Hartman will especially appreciate it.
Click “Fred Columns”, and scroll down for ‘Paris Burns’ - column number 295. As you scroll down you will repeatedly see columns that you will want to read. Fred produces the most wonderfully sardonic writing I’ve ever read. I wouldn’t be surprised if only an American could indeed write like this. Enjoy yourselves.
Paris Burns Again
Let’s Roast Frankfurters
November 7, 2005
Paris burns, crackling and popping as merrily as a Yule log when England was still Merrie and still English. Moslems prance about setting things alight, cars incinerate briskly, and the police suck their thumbs. Diversity. Oh yes. And more to come.
Time and again these days, national governments let in all sorts of people who belong somewhere else. Pretty soon the country has so many that the government comes to fear them. At that point the problem passes beyond easy solution. So politicians paper over everything, and make concessions to buy a year’s peace. The newcomers breed and increase. By and by the remaining possibilities are acquiescence or civil war.
Which latter, boys and girls, isn’t impossible.
The assiduously courted invasion usually rests on a curious idealism that I find hard to credit in adults. The notion is that we are all just people, brothers under the skin, that all we need is love and understanding, black and white together, kum bah ya; only a few reactionary forces need to be stilled to bring about universal bliss. This happy thought doesn’t surprise me among students in high school. Politicians aren’t.
Has no one noticed that diversity doesn’t work? Putting together peoples with little in common begs for trouble, usually with success. It is the chief source of the world’s bloodshed and enmity.
Look around you. Start with Canada, where the Brits and French detest each other. Drop down to the USA, where black, white, and brown wait uneasily for no one is sure what; the lid is held on by Washington, which acts as a sort of federal Tito. There are Hindus and Moslems in India, Tamils and Sinhalese in Sri Lanka, blacks and whites in South Africa, Moslems and Buddhists in Thailand, Turks and Germans in Germany, Vietnamese and Montagnards in Vietnam, Moslems and animists in the Sudan, Jews and Moslems in Israel, Cambodians and Vietnamese in Cambodia, Protestants and Catholics in Ireland, Indians and Mexicans in Chiapas, Basques and Spaniards in Spain, Indians and Fijians in Fiji.
But what have facts to do with foreign relations? It is much more entertaining to base policy on adolescent theories and see what happens.
When the anticipated melding fails and riots ensue, the response is to try to buy, or legislate, the impossible. Invariably the cry arises that the government hasn’t done enough for the indigent arrivals. We must spend more money on welfare, on schools, on special programs to raise the unraisable and mix the immiscible. It is our fault really. We need to change our outmoded attitudes, require classes on ethnic sensitivity, celebrate the culture of the new incompatibles. We will have National Islamic History Week, and children will make mosques from construction paper. That will fix everything.
Instead the problem gets worse. The majority population becomes angrier, but has no recourse. The government is against them. The immigrants can loot and burn, and nothing is likely to happen to them: Punishing their misbehavior would engender more violence, which the government wants to avoid at any cost. If the citizenry defend themselves, as for example by shooting arsonists, the government will put them in prison. Citizens have much to lose; the malefactors do not.
A spring is thus wound.
Moslems in particular are poison. A failed civilization, Islam sends its unsuccessful, thus double failures, to Europe. They gravitate to slums because they can do nothing else. Cohesive, angry, ineffectual, with no loyalty to their new home, they neither flourish nor assimilate. Resentment grows among them. And so the cities burn.
Which is interesting. In the United States, the hostility of Islam is often attributed to American support of Israel. Beyond doubt, there is truth in this. It does not explain the riots in Paris, the papered-over violence in other European countries, the Islamic terrorism in Russia and in southern Thailand, the anti-Christian fighting in East Timor, or the terror in Kashmir. Moslems are trouble.
Immigration is not prima facie a bad idea. It depends on who you let in. Some immigrants can assimilate. If for example the United States allows the entry of moderate numbers of reasonably educated Chinese, nothing untoward will happen. The Chinese share such crucial European traits as studiousness and respect for law. In fact they are superior to the white population in both respects. Consequently they arouse little hostility and not a little admiration. They may congregate for a generation or so in Chinatown, but the term designates a place where a lot of Chinese live, not a hostile ghetto.
Other immigrants cannot assimilate. Most especially practitioners of Islam cannot prosper in Europe. Watch.
Incomprehensibly, permitting their entry has been a deliberate decision. Europe could have kept these swarming newcomers out by simply not letting them in. No visa, no work permit, instant deportation. It didn’t. Now France and Holland are on the edge. Amsterdam could be the next Paris. England, once a delightful land of safety and civility, becomes in parts a North African slum. I have no sympathy. They made the choice. But why did they do it?
For that matter, if Washington wanted to end the illegal immigration of Latinos, it could do so in a paragraph: Establish a fine of five thousand dollars a day for employing illegals or renting them accommodations, half of it to go to the person turning the offender in; require proof of citizenship for welfare in any form, or use of the schools; allow police to demand a green card at their discretion; put the army along the border with orders to shoot. It won’t happen, of course. I don’t care, but let’s not be surprised at the consequences.
What the French need to do, but won’t, is to send the army into the Islamic slums, round up the whole lot, and put them ashore on the beaches of North Africa with a box lunch and a coupon for three free Dunkin Donuts. It isn’t a pretty answer. It’s a lot prettier than what seems to be coming down the pike.
Ah, but there is the little matter that the enlisted ranks of the French army are heavily Moslem. Again, the more you let in, the less you can do about them. For France, I’d guess that the war is over, though the fighting just begins.
People and governments by nature temporize, avert their eyes from forthcoming catastrophe, eschew the needful but unpleasant, and do not readily believe that the status quo can abruptly change. But it can, and does, and is. Meanwhile absurd intellectuals write pointless articles in glossy magazines. Soon it will be too late for civilized answers.
Then what? That is the question.
Sir Henry Morgan
I cannot prove it, but it very much looks like the agenda has a name: Frankfurter Schule. From it stems cultural marxism, and it’s aim is anarchy.
And don’t forget that European heads of state, Joop den Uyl in NL, surrendered to the Middle East in 1974, during the oil crisis. Very likely Britain did the same. The Middle East demanded Islam for oil, and a secret treaty was signed that Europe would open their borders for Islam in return for no more oil shortages. From the Middle East, it was blackmail, helped by the ‘Club of Rome’, with their doom scenario’s (akin to current climatism), and from our ‘leaders’, it was no less than high treason. People have been shot for less.
@R. Hartman, Moral of story, follow the money or oil!
@Sounder,
I’m afraid there’s more to it than that:
http://americanthinker.com/2007/02/cultural_marxism.html
Frankfurt School. Yes, I’ve read of this. And I can personally remember events of 1973-74.
And people HAVE been executed for less. Personally, I’d rather go back to living a 19th century existence within a 21st century social and political framework, than submit to Islam.
I grew up without electricity in the 50s/60s (there were places in Wales like that then), without gas, without running tapwater, without mains drainage. Two of my chores when I was a child were having to go to the well every day after school, regardless of weather or temperature, for two buckets of drinking water (very very heavy for someone of junior school age - especially with the well being at the bottom of a very long and steep hill - going down with empty, light, buckets was fine, up with full heavy buckets not so). I also used to have to help my father every week to dig a hole to empty the other bucket into.
My getting to school every day involved a total of about three miles walking every day - each way. Very hilly and some of it x-country. No staying home for bad weather either. Junior school age…
I’d rather go back to that than submit. At least I could still think my own thoughts and choose my own girls.
Sir Henry Morgan,
Your second post crossed my response to the first.
What I don’t agree with is this: “I have no sympathy. They made the choice” Our politicians made the choice, not us. After all, democracy is only the tiranny of the majority. And even then, once elections are over, politicians tend to follow their own agenda, regardless of the promises that got the naives to vote for them.
What I do not approve of (I realise it’s not your text, you’re just quoting) is theis: “Establish a fine of five thousand dollars a day for employing illegals or renting them accommodations, half of it to go to the person turning the offender in” The “reward” money would attract too many people only interested in a quick buck, regardless of morale. If things were this simple, some rightwing politician might have proposed it already (and be called a fascist/racist).
The quote’s right about what the French (and the rest of Europe) need to to though. And about Amsterdam. People are already driven from their homes, bought out by the local council, and no attempts are being made to round up the troublemakers. Same goes for Utrecht, where children in ages 6-10 have been molested and sexually harassed on a daily basis by children age 12, all of Moroccan descent. Local authorities knew about it for 8-10 months, but have not responded, as “it’s a difficult issue to address”. Makes me want to puke.
Sir Henry Morgan,
While I don’t go back that far, I go back far enough (born mid 50’s). But I see your point, and totally concur. I’m currently looking into moving to Florida. It may not help forever, but I feel NL is lost beyond repair. I’ll never surrender to Islam. I’d be better off dying while fighting. Problem is I intend to enter America legally. And it looks like that’s not going to be easy. Be safe.
Original Arabic
http://www.elaph.com/ElaphWeb/AsdaElaph/2007/7/245403.htm
Why won’t Europe deport all Muslims and be done with terrorism?
By Khodeir Tahir
Translation to English by Abdullah Al Araby
Countries have the right to protect themselves and to guarantee the safety of their citizens from terrorism. It is obvious that the sources of criminal acts of terrorism in Europe and America are their Muslims communities.
Wherever Muslims live, the outcome is always acts of terrorism and murder. This will continue as long as nobody knows the intentions of people, and can not separate the honorable immigrant from the criminal terrorist.
Not all Muslims in Europe and America are prone to get involved in terrorism. The problem is that even those Muslims, most of them don’t have any sense of loyalty to the nations that provided them housing, education, employment opportunities and the right to citizenship. Unfortunately, most Muslims, but not all, betray the favor shown them by these good countries and engage in forgery, fraud, and bank embezzlement schemes.
This brings a legitimate question: Since the security systems in these countries can’t discern good immigrants from the bad who break the laws, in an effort to free themselves of terrorism and protect their citizens, why don’t they simply deport all Muslims regardless of their ethnicities from Europe and America ?
As a Muslim immigrant from an Arabic background, I sincerely, call upon the European and American nations to kick out every Muslim, including myself, even though I love and am loyal the country I live in, the USA. Muslims like me have been shamed and embarrassed by the criminal and despicable acts of Muslims of all ethnicities. We don’t deserve to enjoy the benefit of living in these generous and civilized countries which we constantly betray and return kindness with criminal and treacherous stabs in the back.
Along similar lines, please see this post at Our Children are the Guarantors: Choice is Free
@1389: Thanks for providing that link. This is what I’d like to see much more of on the Net — people applying their own approach to the ‘Boycott Islam’ idea, whether it’s through graphics, writing or compilation of evidence.
There needs to be a listing of companies that are verified to be influenced by Muslim stockholders, for instance, especially by Saudi Arabians. The Saudis are responsible for the majority of the subtle takeover attempts. They are quite good at it — I’m sure most of you remember those commercials after 9-11 from the Saudis. They didn’t put me at ease; I was right in the middle of reading a book at the time from Dore Gold, Hatred’s Kindgom, and that’s when I first learned of the Wahhabis.
We should have a campaign to boycott any Muslim who has been to Mecca for Hajj.
Couple of months back some French kafirs were killed by Muslims. They were camping outside the city of Mecca and by mistake they strayed into city limits!
We boycotted the apertheid regime of South Africa, segregated buses in south - then why not boycott the people who actively take part in this religious apertheid?
Dee says: “We should have a campaign to boycott any Muslim who has been to Mecca for Hajj”
There are likely hundreds of thousands of them who have not made their pilgrimage yet to Mecca. How about paying their way? One way.
I keep hoping the boycott might gain momentum but I fear we’re in the minority. Still, we’ve got to try.
http://boycott-islam.blogspot.com/
“Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyzes the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step.” — Sir Winston Churchill - circa 1899
I just read tha Europe is looking at 100 Million Muslims living within its borders by 2050. This will equal the entire 2050 populations of France and Germany. The West must wake up fast…
I love this blog. God Bless Western Man!