I finally sent a long overdue email to “Reverend” Jim Sutter. I made it quite clear that if I find proof that he has been behind the machinations that have caused undue distress to bloggers and readers of the Anvil, in addition to the constant libel with which he has already painted me a “hater”, then I will be left with no other choice than to gather a group of Texas lawyers and slap him with a Civil Suit that will bankrupt him.
I do not make such threats lightly. Back off, Jim, or you’re going to find out why my nickname isn’t Wallflower and how pro bono attorneys make valuable friends.
Enough is enough, is enough, you hypocritical troll. Go back in your cave and stay out of my affairs.
I will not issue another warning.
BACKGROUND: Kooky Jim Sutter: Good News on Spreading Ban of Hate Speech Site
Podcasts Archive
I had a quick look at your previous article on Sutter FH.
We don’t like hypocrites like this anywhere,anytime.Not only hypocrites, but possible un-American.
On a lighter note the first thing that came into my mind was one of the characters in “The Best Little Whorehouse in Texas”
He was a “moral crusader”.
Remember the one who got the cat house closed down and then everyone was sorry it happened?
Hi Anvil,
Dr Pat had an interesting pathological analysis of people like this: they are full of hate (frustration, etc. because their ideal hasn’t worked out), but they can only think of themselves as peace-loving individuals. Psychology kicks in at this point and turns ‘the enemy’ into a person who hates. This the mechanism, sort of. Form of projection.
Also well known in Leftist circles (Sheean): Narcissistic problems: the opposite of Narcissistic rage are people who’d kill people for their own good: utopia by the sword, as it were.
Good luck with this one.
You go Foe! If there is anything I can do to assist, just ask. I have all kinds of correspondence from him saved - I save everything - including the comment that is a veiled threat to ladypredator.
@Bigsibling: Thanks. If I do have to go after Sutter legally, I will definitely take you up on that offer.
Folks, we are living in a time wherein we are being told that “evil is good and good is evil” and I’m just sick of it.
I know this is a war right here where we live. It isn’t just in Iraq and Afghanistan. Those are just fronts in the Long War. Those of us with ideas that don’t mesh with the ‘politically correct’ are being libeled constantly. CAIR is setting up stunts to insulate Islam from criticism, as with the Flying Imams case, and now I’m not so sure that this Flushing Koran case isn’t more of the same.
Then toss in thought-police like Sutter and it all amounts to the same thing — by calling people that are rightly questioning the roots of the war that we are in “haters”, it emboldens our enemies.
Gentle Christians are being murdered in Afghanistan by Taliban thugs as a result of real hate. What I do here is anything but. I’m trying to save the world from a theocratic ideology of hate. That includes many Muslims. I will not say ‘most’ though. I am not going to start falling into that trap. We can not win a war against a legion of martyrs, be they destined for Paradise for blowing themselves up, or they might wish to make us think they are trapped inside a cult, but instead playing us again as fools until it’s too late and Islam has taken over our governments.
Now I know why I’m a Machiavellian. I play this game better than anyone.
Not even the underpinning powers of the Internet that think they are above reproach like Blogger/Google/Digg, etc. are in a position to defy the U.S. Constitution and get away with it. Some within those companies are definitely trying. I say to their CEOs, reign in those fascists or you’d better be prepared for a confrontation on the Net, a war of words, and you will lose stockholders, user-base and respect by the time it is all over if you continue to protect Islamists and attack Freedom of Expression and Thought.
Am I hot today? Yes. I am beyond it. I’m ready to rumble.
All I can say is “You Go Foe”. Sutter, like many thought police is the true purveyor of hate. And like the thought police of the past he uses unsavory tactics to bully people into silence. He did that with me and when that didn’t work, he thought posting lies and defamation would.
The truly scary part is the fact that there are others who think like him (Dobson’s and Sutter’s group HateWatchUSA for example), perhaps not as deranged but are just as willing to shut down free speech. The founders of this country are rolling in their graves at the whole concept of “hate speech.”
Well, Foehammer, you certainly managed to get Sutter’s attention directed to my blog
. He felt obliged to defend himself and expose ‘Lady Lexington’ which I take to be Lady Predator here.
Seems like the man can’t spell ‘Death cult’ or ‘Political Doctrine’ as he sees Islam as a religion, which is about ‘religious worship’. He must’ve been lobotomised at young age somewhere.
“I only expose hate speech and hate crimes using the very strict definition used by US Courts, ISP’s TOS, the dictionary and EU law.”
He definitely does not have the ability to distinguish between facts and propaganda, and between politically correct and morally correct. And he certainly does not understand that he will be among the first to be beheaded, not being just a mere despicable infidel, but a member of the ‘other people’ (Jews and Christians; the exact term escapes me at the moment).
Pathetic.
‘People of the Book’
Sutter walks a very thin line between delusion and reality. Most of what he does has very little to do about defending the rights of the “oppressed” and more to do with propping up his ego.
I wonder who he thinks is calling for: “lynching, concentration camps, murder, “nuking” Islamic nations, forcibly deporting all Muslim-Americans, destroying the Constitution in order to outlaw the religion of Islam and making religious worship a crime”
I called for the cessation of all Muslim immigration the deporting of non citizens and the close monitoring of mosques. I would prolly call for no foreign born or trained imams as well.
FYI if anyone wants a copy of Sutter’s threats to Glen Glen of Islam: The Religion of Peace they can email him foe copies.
FYI I finally ran across someone that who doesn’t care the Sutter is a poser and uses libel as a form of rebut.
strategytalk.org/phpBB2/viewtopic...b6dbecb30b514877b018a536eecad2ad
I took a quick scan at Sutter’s blog. He seems to be obsessed with uncovering what he calls hate, but in fact, he displays a lot of hate himself. I also noticed that the past seven of his posts have no comments; therefore, he is nothing but a stream of piss in the wind. Pay no attention to him.
Steve said:
I disagree. Keep in mind that Pim Fortuyn, a trenchant critic of Moslems and Islam, was assassinated by a delusional do-gooder who wanted to protect Moslems. One should never underestimate the length Sutter’s kind will go to defend a barbaric ideology and its adherents.
Foehammer,
I’ve been a regular reader of Jihad Watch and frequently have commented there over the past year and a half. On my second blog, Jihad Watch Watch, I analyzed a couple of claims this Rev. Sutter made about Spencer. He has an apparent tactic of mounting a mountain of claims that are putative “evidence”, but when a person takes the trouble to sift through and examine the substance of his “evidence” closely, it tends to fall apart. Sutter responded on my above-mentioned blog a few times, and even when he just writes one sentence, he manages to pack it with subtly incorrect and/or misleading claims. He is either a very clever weaver of deception, or his mind is just naturally locked onto disinformation mode, powered by an overriding agenda of “exposing” what he thinks is “hate”.
However, one thing to keep in mind about Sutter and his ilk: his views about what constitutes “hate” — and his reflexive defense and whitewash of Islam* — find a rather congenial fit with the Politically Correct Multiculturalist paradigm that is dominant and mainstream in our West; so, unfortunately, his views will still find more general sympathy than ours: we are still in a minority, I believe.
*(example, to show how wonderful Islamic culture is, Sutter provides one link in his pdf file demonizing Spencer that is by one Muslim apologist trying to whitewash the wifebeating verse of the Koran, 4:34, by among other things claiming that the word for “beat” in the verse does not mean “physically beat” but something completely harmless)