<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gates of Vienna blocked by Blogger</title>
	<link>http://foehammer.net/2007/07/gates-of-vienna-blocked-by-blogger.html</link>
	<description>Anti-NWO, Anti-Islamofascism, Anti-Islam, Pro-West, Pro-USA: Helping spread politically incorrect truth before the demise of Western Civilization becomes a reality.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 15:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>by: Blogger.com Makes It Too Easy to Censor Blogs - What to Do?</title>
		<link>http://foehammer.net/2007/07/gates-of-vienna-blocked-by-blogger.html#comment-7758</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 20:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://foehammer.net/2007/07/gates-of-vienna-blocked-by-blogger.html#comment-7758</guid>
					<description>[...] Gates of Vienna Blocked by Blogger [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Gates of Vienna Blocked by Blogger [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ft. Hard Knox &#187; Blog Honor Roll 07/19/07</title>
		<link>http://foehammer.net/2007/07/gates-of-vienna-blocked-by-blogger.html#comment-7582</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 14:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://foehammer.net/2007/07/gates-of-vienna-blocked-by-blogger.html#comment-7582</guid>
					<description>[...] from the MSM;People will call you a &#8220;geek;&#8221; there&#8217;s porn on the internet&#8230; Gates of Vienna blocked by Blogger Another case of censorship? You decide. More at the 1389 Blog.  Share [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] from the MSM;People will call you a &#8220;geek;&#8221; there&#8217;s porn on the internet&#8230; Gates of Vienna blocked by Blogger Another case of censorship? You decide. More at the 1389 Blog.  Share [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Digg and Blogger banning more anti-jihad related sites « Foehammer&#8217;s Anvil</title>
		<link>http://foehammer.net/2007/07/gates-of-vienna-blocked-by-blogger.html#comment-7572</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 02:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://foehammer.net/2007/07/gates-of-vienna-blocked-by-blogger.html#comment-7572</guid>
					<description>[...] Well, in the past twenty minutes I received not one but two emails from separate bloggers informing me that Digg and Blogger have both seen fit to label them as &#8220;spam&#8221; and ban them in their own way. A Blogger ban is the most serious since it disables a site almost entirely (i.e. cannot post), as was the case for 18 hours most recently with Gates of Vienna. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Well, in the past twenty minutes I received not one but two emails from separate bloggers informing me that Digg and Blogger have both seen fit to label them as &#8220;spam&#8221; and ban them in their own way. A Blogger ban is the most serious since it disables a site almost entirely (i.e. cannot post), as was the case for 18 hours most recently with Gates of Vienna. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Foehammer</title>
		<link>http://foehammer.net/2007/07/gates-of-vienna-blocked-by-blogger.html#comment-7562</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://foehammer.net/2007/07/gates-of-vienna-blocked-by-blogger.html#comment-7562</guid>
					<description>That may be correct, Living, but Google does not have its hands entirely clean when it comes to other areas like censorship:

&lt;a href="http://www.blogitive.com/2006/10/26/google-refuses-censorship-except-for-china/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Google Refuses Censorship (except for China)&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That may be correct, Living, but Google does not have its hands entirely clean when it comes to other areas like censorship:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.blogitive.com/2006/10/26/google-refuses-censorship-except-for-china/">Google Refuses Censorship (except for China)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Living in the Right-wing Nuthouse</title>
		<link>http://foehammer.net/2007/07/gates-of-vienna-blocked-by-blogger.html#comment-7560</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 08:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://foehammer.net/2007/07/gates-of-vienna-blocked-by-blogger.html#comment-7560</guid>
					<description>It was &lt;em&gt;Yahoo!&lt;/em&gt; that turned over email info to the ChiComs, not Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was <em>Yahoo!</em> that turned over email info to the ChiComs, not Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Always On Watch</title>
		<link>http://foehammer.net/2007/07/gates-of-vienna-blocked-by-blogger.html#comment-7553</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://foehammer.net/2007/07/gates-of-vienna-blocked-by-blogger.html#comment-7553</guid>
					<description>Foehammer,
Another example I know of: PhotoBucket refused to allow &lt;a href="http://librabunda.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Mark Alexander&lt;/a&gt; to post the Mo cartoons and pics of Muslims carrying signs saying "Behead those who insult Islam."

The warning signs for the blogosphere are apparent!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Foehammer,<br />
Another example I know of: PhotoBucket refused to allow <a href="http://librabunda.blogspot.com/">Mark Alexander</a> to post the Mo cartoons and pics of Muslims carrying signs saying &#8220;Behead those who insult Islam.&#8221;</p>
<p>The warning signs for the blogosphere are apparent!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ft. Hard Knox &#187; Blog Honor Roll 07/19/07</title>
		<link>http://foehammer.net/2007/07/gates-of-vienna-blocked-by-blogger.html#comment-7549</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 15:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://foehammer.net/2007/07/gates-of-vienna-blocked-by-blogger.html#comment-7549</guid>
					<description>[...] from the MSM,;People will call you a &#8220;geek;&#8221; there&#8217;s porn on the internet&#8230; Gates of Vienna blocked by Blogger Another case of censorship? You decide. More at the 1389 Blog: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] from the MSM,;People will call you a &#8220;geek;&#8221; there&#8217;s porn on the internet&#8230; Gates of Vienna blocked by Blogger Another case of censorship? You decide. More at the 1389 Blog: [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Foehammer</title>
		<link>http://foehammer.net/2007/07/gates-of-vienna-blocked-by-blogger.html#comment-7548</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 15:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://foehammer.net/2007/07/gates-of-vienna-blocked-by-blogger.html#comment-7548</guid>
					<description>@Always:  That's a hell of a list that Warren posted and I'm grabbing that first quote for my own bin.  If that actually was the cause for someone to censor him, then it is indeed apparent that fascists and thought-police are active.  I will be posting a related article today or tomorrow as a result, once again inspired by the actions of others against me.

I suspect it is the systems that companies like Digg and Google use that are broken, and perhaps it is yet not the direct intent of the majority of their heads to actually censor sites like mine, GoVs and Warren's, but I'm just still giving benefit of the doubt until I follow the money and end up finding Marxists and Islamists holding company stock interests, and then I'll most likely sing a different tune.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Always:  That&#8217;s a hell of a list that Warren posted and I&#8217;m grabbing that first quote for my own bin.  If that actually was the cause for someone to censor him, then it is indeed apparent that fascists and thought-police are active.  I will be posting a related article today or tomorrow as a result, once again inspired by the actions of others against me.</p>
<p>I suspect it is the systems that companies like Digg and Google use that are broken, and perhaps it is yet not the direct intent of the majority of their heads to actually censor sites like mine, GoVs and Warren&#8217;s, but I&#8217;m just still giving benefit of the doubt until I follow the money and end up finding Marxists and Islamists holding company stock interests, and then I&#8217;ll most likely sing a different tune.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>