[Note: I originally wrote the following article on June 5, 2006, but in light of the fact that it was read by only a handful of visitors and being quite applicable to the mood surrounding the recent ‘Jihad Doctors’ attack in the UK, I’m resurrecting it.]
The words of a Muslim in Canada gave me a terribly simple and effective idea this morning. First the quote:
The charges allege that the men knowingly participated in a terrorist group and either received or provided terrorist training in Toronto, nearby Mississauga, Fort Erie — a border town across from Buffalo, N.Y. — and Ramara Township, located on the shores of Lake Simcoe in central Ontario’s cottage country.
A federal official said he expects some serious reflection in government and security circles about how young people raised in Canada could allegedly conspire to commit such crimes.
“Most of them went through the school system here. They’re not just off the plane. So there will be some questioning going on,” the official said.
“The big issue is going to be societal, that’s clear.”…
Farhad Oryakhim, 17, an employee at an east-end shop, said he’s concerned about how Muslims in Canada are going to be treated in the wake of the arrests.
“It’s going to be a pretty hard time now,” Oryakhim said. “After this incident, people are going to look at the Muslims from a dangerous view.”
Oryakhim said he fears that non-Muslim customers will stop patronizing businesses in the area that are run by Muslims.
“It’s going to hurt our businesses,” he said. “Our life.”
Farhad has some idea of what the future holds.
And he has unwittingly given us the solution to the Muslim presence in our neighborhoods and schools and businesses: boycott them.
Simple and effective. Every single one of us can do it. Just refuse to patronize any establishment that is run or owned by Muslims, from gas stations to convenience stores, dry cleaners to restaurants to specialty grocery stores and the like. You know the signs to look for by now and most people are intelligent enough to differentiate between a peaceful Hindu and a Muslim. But, if you need a clue, just look for the women. If you can’t find any or the ones that you do find are veiled or hooded, well, then you’re probably dealing with Muslims. There’s an even easier way to know for sure though — and that’s just locate your local mosques and remember a few faces.
Prejudice in action? Of course. But have we not been given not only a right but an obligation to exercise such prejudice when it is in the interests of our future and our safety and the sanctity of our nations? It’s either this or violence. So, what choice have we been given?
We all have a basic right to decide where we put our money, and if we collectively refuse to give any of it to the Muslim community then that community will eventually cease to exist OR it will be forced to reform itself and assimilate to our societies. So, here is the perfect chance for the so-called “moderate” Muslims to do something about their own backyards and not just give us all lip-service.
It’s either time for Muslims to change or to realize that they are no longer welcome and that they must move to greener pastures.
Boycott Islam.
ADDENDUM: Shortly after this article hit the frontpage of the Anvil, it was submitted by a reader to Digg.com, or it was “Dugg” according to standard Net vernacular. About one day later that submission was forcibly removed from Digg by the editors of that site without a word to me or a response to my subsequent complaints, the submitter’s account was banned and all capacity for Digging articles from Foehammer’s Anvil revoked. Think perhaps this story was only “buried” and not completely erradicated from Digg.com along with over 100 comments there? Search for it yourself and be sure to click Include Buried Stories option. If you find it “buried”, please contact me.
Podcasts Archive
Sir Henry Morgan,
Worrying indeed. They may deny, but the facts (if true) are clear enough. Even if not true, the signs are pointing there, so it’s only a matter of time.
Not sure about the UK, but NL is back on the eve of WW II, selling of military equipment to pay for the Afghan operation, leaving the country defenseless again. So we’ll probably have one tank, one plane and a helicopter left, along with some guns and two boxes of unmatching ammo. I guess we’re counting on the Americans again, like always, but why would they? They certainly won’t feel loved by anti-American Europe.
NL should stop pumping money into ‘needy’ regions, and work on it’s own strength. But instead, Jan Potter Balkenende is selling us out to te EU (like TonyBlair did the UK), handing our taxpayer’s money away into bottomless pits while utterly forsaking government piority #1, governments one right to exist: protecting the safety of the country and its people.
Mr Hartman
Much sense indeed. We are in as pitiful a state here in the UK.
And Pakistan is the one to watch. Here’s a copy of a comment I made on Up Pompeii, here in UK, earlier this evening:
Sir HM wrote:
OT, but:
“” Shots heard near Musharraf’s plane
Gunshots were heard Friday not far away from a military air base when the aircraft of Pakistani President General Pervez Musharraf was in the air, officials said. Top army spokesman Major General Waheed Arshad denied some local news reports that the president’s plane was targeted by a rocket. A police official and two security officials, all requesting anonymity because they were not authorized to talk to the press, said police found two anti-aircraft guns on a rooftop near Chaklala Air Base in Rawalpindi, a garrison city near the capital, Islamabad. “”
http://www.aftenposten.no/english/world/article1873932.ece
I really do hope we in the West have those contingency plans in place to eliminate Pakistan’s nuclear capabilities - the lot: weapons, production facilities, brains.
@Foehammer
I read that Fjordman story yesterday, or the day before. It’s the perfect example of ‘guests’ kicking their host out of his own house. To me this is close to civil war, and it’s very similar to what’s happening in Malmö.
@Sir Henry Morgan
It’s Mr., and only one ‘n’ will do, thank you.
Yes sir, you make perfect sense. I’m just afraid we need to take it one step further, as “their own parts of the world” will soon have nuclear power, either because Iran will be allowed to continue its nuclear program, probably aided by America, like N.-Korea (thank you Bill Clinton and Dhimmy Carter) if the Democrats get their way, or else the nuclear arsenal of Pakistan will fall into Al Qaeda hands once Musharraf can no longer hold them off. And unlike the West, and even Russia, who value life and had a passive standoff we called the Cold War, Islam values death and will make no bones about eradicating the kafirs. This threat is very real. As Fatah, Hezbollah and Hamas have proven over and over again, Islam doesn’t care how many of their own will go down, as they can be replaced and multiply like rabbits anyway.
I agree that labeling left, right, center does not mean much. It’s just that here in NL we don’t seem to have any thinkers on the left anymore (the Left obviously disagrees). They’re all appeasers of Islam, acting like SantaClaus and issuing new limiting rules and regulations by the day. They’ve announced today to spend 40 million euro of taxpayer money to set up “a proper judicial system” in Afghanistan, while the Dutch judicial system itself is as corrupt as it gets, with leftist judges and paedophile top officials, subject to blackmail by foreign governments.
Islam and cultural marxism are the greatest threats to individual freedom, as their ultimate goal is total egalitarianism. Islam is a cultural marxist’s wet dream, as it will ensure everybody is being enslaved, submitted to Islam under Sharia law. Egalitarianism in its most ultimate form. And the liberal politicians must expect to be rewarded for their collaboration, to become part of the rich and powerful elite. If not, I don’t get why they’re doing it. Well, they’re in for some surprise, as they will be treated like any other infidel. The only solution I can see is indeed to put the beast back in its cage. But how?
The most efficient way in my opinion is to stop the funding of fundamental organisations like CAIR and the Muslim Brotherhood. Once you stop the funding, you’ll stop the terror. But as the vast bulk of funding comes from the Middle East, beyond our control, all these “we’re so offended” organisations need to go, as well as Islamic schools, Mosques and all other places where fundamental Islam spreads its propaganda. At the same time, Islam needs to be prevented from obtaining nuclear power. But western governments love to talk and hand them their platforms, even subsidise them (against the principle of separation of state and religion), appeasing themselves into their graves. So how to turn the cards?
Do I make sense?
This thread really brought out the Moonbats. I salute your energy to try and knock some sense into them. You really enjoy it don’t you? You know, these flower child liberals are barking to cover the noise of the bombs. But the truth is the bombs are getting closer. It will soon be to loud to ignore. Then they will run to the Koran to find the answer. Hopefully it won’t be to late.
Mr (Mrs Miss Ms ?) Hartmann:
It’s what Muslims do whenever they have a majority over others, even if just a local majority, or a majority over an even smaller minority. It’s what they’ll do to us if they ever get the chance. They can’t help it: it’s in their ideology, their socialisation into the Muslim culture from birth.
The only way to deal with it is to isolate them in their own parts of the world while the rest of us get on with building an at least half-way decent civilisation amongst ourselves. No, I don’t mean a one-world government (that thought absolutely horrifies and terrifies me), but a civilisation of friendly interacting nations where people can get on with their lives in peace. And like Foehammer, I’m a liberal in many ways (here in the UK we call that a ‘lefty’). But I’m not rigidly dogmatic with a refusal to recognise reality when it jumps up and slaps me in the face, like virtually any other liberal/lefty - you know, the sort who’s dogma wont even let them acknowledge an enemy, never mind name it then hammer it into the ground.
I suppose you could call me a pragmatic liberal/lefty. No one side, right, left, centre, conservative. liberal has all the answers. All these approaches have something that is good in them - we should get on with learning to pick and choose bits here and there from all the options/ideologies available. Eclecticism, I believe it’s called.
But first we,ve got to stuff Islam back into it’s cage. Step one is clearing the non-Islamic parts of the world of Muslims.
This making sense to anyone?
Is this making sense to you?
@R. Hartman: You make many excellent points. I was especially upset by a story from Fjordman the other day that discussed Muslim attacks upon Greenlanders.
Muslim Violence
Foehammer, you’re fighting a just fight. Like Cindi, I got here through GoV. I’m surprised and appalled by the huge number of political correct blind people that respond to this thread, that seem to have only half a brain and echo the political correct arguments without having given them any thought. I haven’t read all of the responses, as the list is too long, but want to address one, higher up, by Governator: “Go and give the U.S. forces in Iraq a hand. The U.S. forces dying in that region did not choose to fight this war. It was extremists like yourself who wanted this war.”
Your response was accurate, but lacked one aspect: “The U.S. forces dying in that region” are not fighting a war. They’re dying because their political mandate does not allow them to fight a war. A mandate enforced by the Liberals, the ‘Democrats’ that rather sell out the world to Islam then to defend their democratic freedom. The Dutch captured a top Taliban, which would have supplied them with invaluable information (Cell phone full of other Taliban leaders), but released him almost immediately as they were concerned about unfriendly media coverage on the capture.
Indeed, if only the Allies were fighting a war, they would have won, en destroyed Islam in Iraq. Instead, they’re ‘helping’ to liberate the country, building a democracy, which is not an army’s task. And even if you would make it one, you’d still first have to remove the looters and demolishers, to stand a fighting chance that your building efforts have success with any measure of permanency.
On a final note, if only these blind commenters would take notice of the Fjorman reports on GoV, which details how Islam takes over the western world, especially Europe, and more specifically Scandinavia, by terrorising cities and systematically raping non-Muslim women, they’d open their eyes to what’s really at stake here. But Liberals have never been known to be open to reason, alas.
@Cindi: I’m always glad to see new readers. And if you came by way of GoV, then that’s even better.
Welcome.
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
I am heartened to find another soul willing to see and speak the truth.
Many are joining. Today I heard Dick Morris (hey, I’ll take my allies where I find them) advance our viewpoint and Michelle Malkin has come along as well.
Digg will do as they will, but I found you without them…or Google. I got here through the Gates of Vienna.
@bloodrage bob: They’ve been taught to hate their own nations well, and most Leftists are too stupid or too ignorant to even know they are being manipulated by forces all the way from Mecca to Moscow.
Let’s face it, if someone is a flaming liberal over the age of 30, they are filled with an agenda that reads like a mental handicap. No person in their right mind can look around the world and seek excuses for the behavior of Muslim doctors breaking their Hippocratic oathes, yet the Far Left does it.
There’s little worse than people that run from the Truth because they can’t abide the notion of being wrong. Self-righteous platitudes are usually the only thing the hate-spewers deal in. None of them have even studied Islam or they would not attack me with such venom, or the ones that have studied it and still do so are either traitors or psychotic.
Your points were right on, bob. Thanks for dropping by the Anvil.
these comments are a fascinating little snapshot of a phenomenon i’ve been noticing for quite some time now: angry leftists flaring into “spontaneous” dogma recitation at the *first sign of* any suggestion that ANY non-western, non-christian culture isn’t vastly superior to the american/christian/western ideals so hated by their teachers.
the man suggested “don’t do business with muslims”. he didn’t say ‘burn them out’; he didn’t say ‘kill ‘em all’; he didn’t say ‘make fun of their pathetic backwardness & laughable fear of women’.
the minute i read that, i thought “will be seeing cries of ‘nazi’ and ‘kkk’ soon.” it’s a huge irony that the liberty loving leftists (and islamists) are of course completely unable to see: the very people chanting “we have to be nice to everyone” are the ones most likely to try and silence their political enemies. the ones crying ‘nazi’ are the ones most likely to want to deny us our freedom to refuse to associate with those we consider to be homicidal swine. but hey, don’t take MY word for it: scroll up and see for yourself.