You know the old saying: “Good news travels fast, but bad news travels faster.” So it is that today I received a heads-up on the following claim that the Anvil has been added to “Hate Speech” filters by some institutions and businesses, right along with Jihad Watch and MEMRI (hat-tip: Lady Predator):
Good News! Getting the word out about the dangers of hate mongers is working!
Over the past few days, we have received encouraging news that more and more corporations, agencies, and Internet filtering systems are blacklisting or banning access to Jihad Watch, properly identifying it as a hate speech site. First, we received word that Spencer’s Jihad Watch site has, in very recent days, been blocked or banned by: City of Chicago, Chicago Police, Bank of America, Fidelity Investments, Deutsche Bank, the Veterans’ Administration, Washington Mutual, Site Coach (an Internet filtering program), GE, JP Morgan Chase, Defense Finance and Accounting Services, the U.S. Government, MSNBC, AFSCME, Marriott Corp., and American Airlines.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/017237.php
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/017242.phpNow we’ve received an update on the rapidly spreading ban on Jihad Watch. It has now been including in the commercial filtering of Secure Computing’s “WebWasher” as hate speech. This means that WebWasher’s 19,000 customers, supported by a worldwide network of partners, include the majority of the Dow Jones Global 50 and the most prominent organizations in banking, financial services, healthcare, telecommunications, manufacturing, public utilities, and federal and local governments, will now be blocking access to Jihad Watch. We have also learned that WebWasher has blocked the hate speech sites of HotAir and MEMRI, and that the Foehammer’s Anvil hate speech site has also been blocked or banned as hate speech by site monitoring services, and that other web filtering services are in the process of blocking Jihad Watch, et al.
Good job, and Congratulations to those who had the good sense to ban hate speech, recognizing that hate speech often leads to extremism, and extremism very often leads to terrorism. Secure Computing’s Webwasher seems to be the most alert program to use for filtering Internet content from obscenities, hate speech, and other unwanted sites.
The Jawa Report and Vigilant Freedom have both posted articles about this incident.
The “Reverend” Jim Sutter is a sham, a liar and now he’s getting dangerously close to receiving a certified letter from my attorney.
To any and all organizations, businesses and institutions that have seen fit to actually ban the Anvil: shame, shame, shame on you!
You may email Jim your love at: revjimsutter@gmail.com
I will waste no further time on this troglodyte today.
Podcasts Archive
Oh, my goodness, Foehammer! I had not seen that site before, LOL!
(Anyway, so sorry to take up space in your blog with this nonsense. I’m done with this guy.)
How creepy, LP.
And yeah, I couldn’t believe he said that in my journal. You’d think as a pastor/reverend of some sort, he’d be a little more mature in his communications with people.
I’m not saying anything else to him. After that silly anon line, I realized this is not someone interested in serious conversation. I gave him the benefit of the doubt and he didn’t provide one bit of backup for all the things I caught him on.
I have no time/patience for this. I hope he just goes elsewhere.
Be sure to immortalize Jim the way he deserves. Vote:
Worst Blog of All-Time
Most Obnoxious Blogger
I see that Sutter is now posting anonymously and using 3rd grade name calling techniques, what a surprise: ok not really go and take a look at this bit of sandbox behavior.
I read through quite a bit of his info. and it made my head hurt. As soon as I saw claims of ‘hatred’, the name calling of ‘bigot’ and the cries of victimhood - before there’s even any support for it, the red flags went up. PROJECTION, much?
I replied to his comments and I’ve given him a final chance to respond if he wishes. (So as not to give him more ammo to claim victimhood. He claimed such already, and I swear I had to re-read my own comments to figure out what the blazes he was even talking about! I sure hope teh crazy is not contagious.) After that, I’m done. I have no time or patience for stuff like this. I don’t even know how he found my journal. It’s not like I’m some big name.
Anyway, thanks. Let’s not waste any more time on this guy. He’s got nothing of substance to say, just the usual baseless, ridiculous accusations. I just gave him the benefit of the doubt because I was not familiar with him.
Well Pastor Ernie Sanders thinks he could be dangerous. He does post threatening messages. But his MO is to pretend *he* is the victim and claim other are defaming or staking *him*! His weapon of choice is to “expose” you by post lies and defamation on his blog of lies. I finally had to do a police report on him. He is known for forging emails and pretending he has gotten an threat.
But you should go and read his blog it will give you a good feel about how over the top he is.
So far I’ve only fund one group of people who didn’t give a rats ass that this man post nothing but lies.
Thanks for your help, Lady Predator. Any idea if he’s just the annoying type, or actually dangerous? (Threatening messages, stalking, that type of thing?)
Internet is a scary place. Ah, well. Takes all kinds.
Hi there if you have any questions I would be more than happy to clarify anything about Sutter. Spencer also had some unpleasant dealings with him. I also have some emails from others who have the unfortunate experience of dealing with Sutter that I can pass on.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/017000.php
http://jihadswatch.blogspot.com/search?q=Sutter
http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/188605.php
vigilantfreedom.org/910blog/2007/...p-of-jihadwatch/#comments”
http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/hatewatchhallofshame.blogspot.com/
I had never heard of this guy until he commented in my journal. Before I even read his post, a friend replied and warned me about him and linked to some info. about him. I am skimming some of this right now, but I will have to look into the whole thing a bit more. (That’s how I came back to your site.)
Anyway, I don’t know you personally, and I haven’t been reading your blog for very long. But I was glad to find that you’ve had experience with him because I do trust you more than someone I don’t know at all.
I will check out a few of his comments out on my own, just because I would think that’s fair. (After all, that’s what my original post was all about!)