Most of you will no doubt remember the articles here pertaining to the charges by a substitute teacher in San Diego that she witnessed special treatment given to Muslim students in a public school she worked at. YouTube user xdhimmi posted this clip yesterday that captures the confrontation between San Diego radio talk show host, Roger Hedgecock, and the ever-evasive CAIR-head, Ibrahim Hooper, appearing on FOX News’ O’Reilly Factor while debating the facts behind the matter. Listen to Hooper attempt to frame a “freedom for all religions” plea in order to further the cause of invasive Muslim prayer practices in public places like airports and now schools. It’s all a tactic aimed at indoctrinating via the pomp and circumstance and intimidation that goes along with witnessing Muslim prayer; do not be fooled:
Podcasts Archive
Bill O’reilly won this debate. Simply because he mentioned the ACLU (and would never let anyone get more than five sentences in without an interruption). However, you must examine the fact that the ACLU has always been an extremely bias ad liberal organization.
- If Catholics wanted fountains in the schools, they could get them.
- If they didn’t, they could go to court, and get them.
- If the courts refused them, they would also have to refuse the Muslim prayer time as well. Then there would be yet another period of a TRUE separation of church and state, which is how it should be.
- Muslims throughout the country are becoming more and more passionate about their religion compared to Christians, and actually taking steps to bring it into the school system (remember, I AM A CHRISTIAN)
- The fact that we refer to the Islamic nations as part of the “axis of evils,” show little tolerance and Christian understanding which only fuels their fire.
If the Christians become just as passionate then that will shut the Islamic prayer out of the schools for good. It would also shut Christian prayers out of school, for good.
Christians are letting the Islamic religion walk all over them right now, because they are simply more passionate about bringing it into systems. Yeah Christianity is supposed to be built into a lot of government, but most don’t practice it. It is more of a label to them.
And don’t tell me “IS terrorism PRACTICING ISLAM?” because I have already explained that those are the extremists and that most Muslims in the world do not agree with mass murder and violence to bring about they see as just means.
Everyone, please here scu.edu/ethics/publications/submitted/Perry/holywar.html
That article explains the problems in a “Holy War” and also shows how both the bible and Qur’an have very simiar contexts. It also explains how these contexts can be misconstrued by extremists to read that it is acceptable and encouraged to kill non-believers.
Foehammer
Thanks for providing this video. Roger Hedgecock is a fantastic opponent not just of Jihad, but Islamic supremacy as well, and has in the past, highlighted the rough edges of Islam. Once on Rush’s show, he highlighted the parallels between Ahmadinejad’s
threatinvitation to Bush vs Mohammed’sthreatinvitation to Khusrau of Persia to convert to Islam. In this case, what put Hooper in a bind was the fact that none of the other religions have requirements to pray 5 times a day at very specific times, and so once it was granted to the Muslims, there was no way it could look like all religions were being treated fairly.From the original account, as given by Hedgecock, one hour of prayer? What do they think this is - Saudi Arabia? What next - Jihad sessions in class? Also, why does San Diego have so many Mohammedans?
Please provide evidence for both your assertions - that most Muslims in the world don’t agree with mass murder and violence, as well as the assertion that the contexts can be misconstrued by extremists to justify jihad violence.
What exactly is the Chrisian equivalent of the Sunnah?
How is it that Hooper is still credible and being interviewed in the msm? He’s such a double-talker. Every time he writes something or opens his mouth, I think of Newspeak in Orwell’s 1984
Hooper made it very clear what weapon muslims are using to become more dominant, “The Law”, a phrase he used twice. They intend to use every legal means possible to advance Islam and to close the gap between the separation of church (religion) and state. Look for lots more of this.