Keith Ellison-Muhammad, Congressman from Minnesota, has really stirred the political anthill with his words last week comparing President George W. Bush to Hitler and at the same time hinting that 9-11 was an inside job. The fact that Ellison-Muhammad is also the first and only Muslim to be elected to Congress coupled with these sorts of attacks will surely come back to haunt him — well, to be honest his poorly chosen words already are, and there’s even a videotape:























I love how he is allowed to spew stupidity like that but if someone were to compare him to an evil figure he’d cry racism.
Exactly. It’s always so easy for minorities in the United States to claim “victimhood” which is one of the prime reasons that Islam is having such leaps and bounds successes in shoving itself down our throats at every turn. I can’t count how many times someone has called me a racist here at the Anvil, despite the fact that I have never lashed out at a race, only the cult of Islam.
I always snicker when someone clicks the “You’re a racist” button on one of my polls, too. They are too stupid to realize that I intentionally put out the bait just to unveil their ignorance.
I really think Hitler is in a league of his own, and a bad league at that, and his name is often used for these ludicrous comparisons.
Right on, FH. It shows incredible ignorance.
This still bugs me. 9/11/2001, Pentagon. Where is the Boeing 757-sized hole? In fact, where is the Boeing 757? - http://i12.tinypic.com/6c7rm6t.jpg
I’ve seen plenty of evidence proving that jet aircraft that hit objects at such high speed basically fall apart into mainly very small pieces.
Go here:
Evidence that a 757 DID hit the Pentagon
There is quite a lot of evidence around that says planes disintegrate on impact.They are not built to last these impacts like has been attempted with some cars.Most materials used are light and ‘flimsy’.
I have friends in structural and mechanical engineering and those in the US have no doubt that it was a plane that flew into the Pentagon.
These off-the-wall theories are dangerous and unsound.
This is completely off topic but for the sake of the argument.
When the two planes crashed into the Twin Towers they crashed into steel frames and glass. When the plane crashed into the Pentagon it crashed into reinforced concrete. Which one is easier to punch a whole in? The plane that crashed into the Pentagon obviously didn’t make a hole that the ones that hit the Twin Towers did and it obviously didn’t survive that kind of impact. A plane is nothing more than a large explosive aluminum can.