Coming up next in the blog censorship rogue’s gallery: SurfControl

Published by Foehammer 2 years, 5 months ago in Foehammer's Anvil, Blogosphere and Censorship. Tags: anvil, blog, Blogosphere, censorship, Foehammers Anvil, panera bread, sonicwall, SurfControl, victory.

From my ally over at the 1389blog.com:

We have won one battle!

An Anvil Victory against Censorship: a Victory for All confirms that SonicWALL and Panera Bread will no longer be censoring Foehammer’s Anvil. 1389 would like to thank all of you who participated in this effort.

But the war is far from over.

“The war is far from over? What’s that supposed to mean?”

It means that this is not the time for us to rest.

Want to find out what’s next in the fight against Blogosphere censorship? Visit 1389’s blog and read on.

More trouble: Atlas Banned in Charlotte, NC (hat-tip: Jenn Sierra)

Print This Post

Related Posts

Foehammer.com needs a new SonicWALL rating(35% )
The ‘lite’ mirror of Foehammer’s Anvil (foehammer.net) is located at http://foehammer.com and is currently mis-rated by SonicWALL as I type this: Category 1: Violence/Hate/Racism I noticed
Censorship Tools in the Hands of Fools, Money-Grubbers, Seditionists, Islamists and Traitors(33% )
Are you paying attention? Big Brother Lives. Help put a stop to idiotic, negligent and often seditionist censorship activities that are dampening down an already beleaguered
An Anvil Victory Against Censorship: a Victory for All(23% )
It appears official: SonicWALL Internet Security has re-rated Foehammer’s Anvil from pornography to web communications. This would not have happened without the efforts of
Hammerstrike: Presenting the Boycott Islam Wiki(20% )
As I hinted at a couple of weeks back, I have completed revamping the Boycott Islam: Companies & Products List to now be a wiki-style
Foehammer.com continues to be listed as hate site by SonicWall(19% )
The First Amendment. It guarantees my Right to Free Speech. Yet, here we are 6 months later, after I originally brought up
Is the Anvil blocked where you work?(19% )
The never-tiring 1389 is helping me venture out into the unknown depths of the Internet and will be investigating how much credence there is to rumors

20 Responses to “Coming up next in the blog censorship rogue’s gallery: SurfControl”

Feed for this Entry Trackback Address

Pages: [2] 1 » Show All

1 Foehammer |

Sep 3rd, 2007 at 11:37 pm

Websense, Inc. Interesting:

Websense acquires SurfControl

On April 26, 2007 Websense, Inc. announced its planned acquisition of SurfControl, a provider of on-demand and software-based Web and email security solutions, subject to regulatory approval and approval of SurfControl’s shareholders. The combination of Websense and SurfControl is expected to benefit customers, partners and shareholders by creating an IT security solutions company with the scale and product offering to compete more effectively with large global security software companies.

The pre-conditions to the proposal have been met. On June 4, 2007 the proposal cleared Hart-Scott-Rodino review and on July 6, 2007 the proposal received clearance from the U.K. Office of Fair Trading.
The proposal is being effected by a scheme of arrangement under section 425 of the Companies Act. SurfControl announced that the Scheme Document was posted on July 20, 2007. SurfControl’s shareholders approved the acquisition at meetings held on August 16, 2007, and the expected effective date and closing is October 3, 2007.
2 Gramfan |

Sep 3rd, 2007 at 7:31 pm

Thanks for the explanation, FH.

And thanks to 1389 for all the good work.
Just checked LGF: seems they could be having problems also, but this time from websense.

http://www.websense.com/global/en/

( if I’m not too late hope you all enjoy your holiday )

Pages: [2] 1 » Show All

DISCLAIMER: The comments in response to articles here are entirely the property of the respondents in question and these comments do not necessarily reflect the views or opinons of Foehammer or Foehammer's Anvil. Vulgar, off-topic and otherwise trivial commentary may be edited or removed without notice. Some comments may be automatically held for approval, filtered or otherwise delayed.