I’m contacted daily by concerned citizens of the world. Sometimes I’m contacted by especially talented individuals who seek to actually give of their time and amazing gifts and confront the threat of Islamofascism more directly. Such is the case with the artist Z.
The climate of the past week was one of dhimmitude and submission by Western governments and worst of all the Congress of the United States of America, the Pentagon and President Bush himself. It also saw the retirement of Cox & Forkum from their weekly political cartooning. The appearance of the following cartoon by Z could not then come at a more fitting time:
In the coming months I hope to present more original work from Z here at the Anvil. Stay tuned!
RELATED: Selling the Rope to Those Who Would Hang Us
(hat-tip: Orville)


























Excellent!
Was wondering when someone would have enough gonads to caricature that 7th century pedophiliac war lord who founded that irredeemable death cult.
Love style . . .A+ for humor . . .Perfect.
Very funny, but seriously, I hope this brave funny guy has bodyguards, these spawns, I mean people, of the ROP have no sense of humor.
I read a term today that is fitting: “Sleepwalkers”. That’s what we are. Sleepwalking into oblivion, PC is the pill. It’s pandemic and there are no ‘doctors’, just witless politicians doing their best to keep the symptoms from being scrutinized. It’s like the black plague, no cure. Send the Undertaker.
By Caroline Glick , THE JERUSALEM POST:
“The war is as deep as it is wide. And to win it, the battle for the hearts and minds must be more than a slogan. It must be a war cry that sustains a deliberate, unrelenting effort to convince the Islamic world to dump jihad or face real, physical consequences.”
There is a tempest brewing in the middle eastern region, soon to poison life as we all once knew it, and that means it won’t be contained in that mystical place ‘over there’.
Has the west a spine to fight for survival? We are seeing the opposite at work, sadly.
Good-at least there are a few cartoonists out there willing to irk the peaceful ones!
It’s official: Terrorists endorse Hillary in ‘08
There is now a concerted attempt in Britain to shift the debate about race from taking on and confronting racism and racial inequality to blaming black and Asian communities for the problems that many face. The buzzword is “integration”, now often counterposed, falsely, to multiculturalism.
Culturally distinct communities can be hugely positive and beneficial. We have many such examples of people choosing to live in an area where they are able to worship, shop and bring up their children within the context of their culture. But opponents of multiculturalism have used the post-9/11, post-London bombings climate to push their agenda. Multiculturalism, it is argued, elevates difference and therefore enhances segregation. The Trojan horse for this argument is the debate about Britain’s Muslim communities, much of which is simply Islamophobic. The rightwing press is now rampant with the argument that multiculturalism intensifies segregation.
what do you think?
www.dnsp.co.uk
@C Michaels
Multiculturalism as envisioned, has turned nations into enclaves of disconnected, un-assimilated groups who have no reason to share our culture, values or beliefs which is a misunderstanding by the PC, leftist crowd that “we are all the same”, when in fact we are not. We have nothing in common with them and they have nothing in common with us. There is nothing for them to assimilate into.
Suzanne Fields wrote:
“The great contemporary fault line of multiculturalism is the tolerance of Islamist barbarity that passes for understanding. This Thas led to the conspicuous inability to recognize the dark side of Islam that politicizes authentic religious faith and produces the terrorism that stalks the civilized world. Though only a small number of Muslims actually perceive murder as a religious duty, millions of Muslims support those who do, and many millions more conspicuously refrain from criticizing the evil-doers, either from fear or from a desire to see their faith became dominant across the world.
As a result, “multiculturalism” has become ideology that menaces a culture unable to defend itself. This multiculturalism undercuts assimilation and fosters an anti-American bias in favor of cultures determined to destroy our own. The British example says it all. Multiculturalism in England was shaped not only by academicians, but by civil servants, think tanks, minority pressure groups, center-left politicians, and what John O’Sullivan calls with irony “the Great and the Good.” In The New Criterion magazine, he argues that certain government institutions, together with the popular media, created an ideology of “institutional correctness” of condescending anthropology. The British government, unrestrained by constitutional guarantees of separation of church and state, subsidized ethnic, religious, and linguistic ghettoes by supporting “faith schools,” where minority children were encouraged to maintain the cultures their parents fled. In the interest of tolerance, men and women who knew better rationalized the suppression of women, genital mutilation and even “honor killings” by Muslims. Better to let the natives keep their quaint customs rather than impose common values that smack of ‘Britishness’ ”
There are many more articles like this one, from other sources, that articulate the same observations.
The original concept of multiculturalism is a failure. Borrowing from the PC left, how could we expect immigrants to be just like us, with common values and goals and to expect them to fall in line with the host nation? or expect to impose our will on them?
The left really answers that question with “you should not” or “you can’t”, and guess what? immigrants don’t!