<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Limbaugh says Vote for Hillary</title>
	<link>http://foehammer.net/2008/02/limbaugh-says-vote-for-hillary.html</link>
	<description>Anti-jihad, Anti-Islamofascism, Anti-Islam, Pro-West, Pro-USA: Helping spread politically incorrect truth before the demise of Western Civilization becomes a reality.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: The Resistance</title>
		<link>http://foehammer.net/2008/02/limbaugh-says-vote-for-hillary.html#comment-13475</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 13:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://foehammer.net/2008/02/limbaugh-says-vote-for-hillary.html#comment-13475</guid>
					<description>According to the TROP website, HRC has never been nominated for dhimmwit of the month. She also made it clear that Iran would be attacked if Iran nuked Israel. Guess who was offended? Non other than Pink Floyd's dhimmwit Roger Waters. If Hillary is getting criticized by dhimmwits, maybe she would be the best choice for the Presidency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the TROP website, HRC has never been nominated for dhimmwit of the month. She also made it clear that Iran would be attacked if Iran nuked Israel. Guess who was offended? Non other than Pink Floyd&#8217;s dhimmwit Roger Waters. If Hillary is getting criticized by dhimmwits, maybe she would be the best choice for the Presidency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Infidel Pride</title>
		<link>http://foehammer.net/2008/02/limbaugh-says-vote-for-hillary.html#comment-12920</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 08:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://foehammer.net/2008/02/limbaugh-says-vote-for-hillary.html#comment-12920</guid>
					<description>I know what Rush is saying, but as he said earlier during the primaries when Romney was still viable, if McCain gets elected, it's over for the Conservatives, since McCain would nominate the RNC chair and control all the posts.  If he was that aggressively pro-amnesty as a senator, what makes any of you think he'll be less open borders than Bush as &lt;em&gt;president&lt;/em&gt;?  Given the lack of support McCain has shown to Conservatve causes, he doesn't deserve the support that he'd get by Obama getting bloodied further by Hillary.

So look at the Hillary vs Obama race not in terms of what's good for McCain, but in terms of which is better for the US, since whoever wins will likely trounce McCain.  If Hillary wins, it'll be 4/8 more years of the Clintons, and she has that record of abusing power (the travel office, the FBI files, et al).  If Obama wins, he'll be Liberal, but as a result, you could see a re-run of 1994 in 2010, and a GOP comeback in 2012.  So don't write off BO - support him for now, and let him and the Dems crash and burn once they come to power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know what Rush is saying, but as he said earlier during the primaries when Romney was still viable, if McCain gets elected, it&#8217;s over for the Conservatives, since McCain would nominate the RNC chair and control all the posts.  If he was that aggressively pro-amnesty as a senator, what makes any of you think he&#8217;ll be less open borders than Bush as <em>president</em>?  Given the lack of support McCain has shown to Conservatve causes, he doesn&#8217;t deserve the support that he&#8217;d get by Obama getting bloodied further by Hillary.</p>
<p>So look at the Hillary vs Obama race not in terms of what&#8217;s good for McCain, but in terms of which is better for the US, since whoever wins will likely trounce McCain.  If Hillary wins, it&#8217;ll be 4/8 more years of the Clintons, and she has that record of abusing power (the travel office, the FBI files, et al).  If Obama wins, he&#8217;ll be Liberal, but as a result, you could see a re-run of 1994 in 2010, and a GOP comeback in 2012.  So don&#8217;t write off BO - support him for now, and let him and the Dems crash and burn once they come to power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: tgusa</title>
		<link>http://foehammer.net/2008/02/limbaugh-says-vote-for-hillary.html#comment-12898</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://foehammer.net/2008/02/limbaugh-says-vote-for-hillary.html#comment-12898</guid>
					<description>Who’s his running mate going to be, Ray Nagin? The fact that this guy is the democrat offering proves that to be a democrat you have to be retarded or on drugs, one or the other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who’s his running mate going to be, Ray Nagin? The fact that this guy is the democrat offering proves that to be a democrat you have to be retarded or on drugs, one or the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sounder</title>
		<link>http://foehammer.net/2008/02/limbaugh-says-vote-for-hillary.html#comment-12897</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://foehammer.net/2008/02/limbaugh-says-vote-for-hillary.html#comment-12897</guid>
					<description>I am of course, an onlooker. My 2 cents: When I see a man poised to lead a nation who will not wear the flag pin of his country on his lapel, nor cover his heart with his hand in patriotic moments and then we hear that his wife was not proud of America until just the other day, a man who served as a paid director on the board of a nonprofit organization that granted funding to a controversial Arab group that mourns the establishment of Israel as a 'catastrophe', a man who stated he will surrender Iraq to jihadists, a man who has pledged:

I will cut investments in unproven [sic] missile defense systems...
I will not weaponize space...
I will slow development of Future Combat Systems...
I will institute a "Defense Priorities Board" to [prevent] unnecessary spending...
I will set a goal of a world without nuclear weapons...and to seek that goal, I will not develop nuclear weapons...
I will seek a global ban on the development of fissile material...and I will negotiate with Russia to take our ICBMs off hair-trigger alert...
and to achieve deep cuts in our nuclear arsenals...

Yes America will indeed see 'change' and I would be very concerned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am of course, an onlooker. My 2 cents: When I see a man poised to lead a nation who will not wear the flag pin of his country on his lapel, nor cover his heart with his hand in patriotic moments and then we hear that his wife was not proud of America until just the other day, a man who served as a paid director on the board of a nonprofit organization that granted funding to a controversial Arab group that mourns the establishment of Israel as a &#8216;catastrophe&#8217;, a man who stated he will surrender Iraq to jihadists, a man who has pledged:</p>
<p>I will cut investments in unproven [sic] missile defense systems&#8230;<br />
I will not weaponize space&#8230;<br />
I will slow development of Future Combat Systems&#8230;<br />
I will institute a &#8220;Defense Priorities Board&#8221; to [prevent] unnecessary spending&#8230;<br />
I will set a goal of a world without nuclear weapons&#8230;and to seek that goal, I will not develop nuclear weapons&#8230;<br />
I will seek a global ban on the development of fissile material&#8230;and I will negotiate with Russia to take our ICBMs off hair-trigger alert&#8230;<br />
and to achieve deep cuts in our nuclear arsenals&#8230;</p>
<p>Yes America will indeed see &#8216;change&#8217; and I would be very concerned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: TexasInfidel</title>
		<link>http://foehammer.net/2008/02/limbaugh-says-vote-for-hillary.html#comment-12888</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 05:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://foehammer.net/2008/02/limbaugh-says-vote-for-hillary.html#comment-12888</guid>
					<description>Can't tell if my thoughts got through or not.  The first time was rejected because forgot to respond to the question at the bottom.  I then rephrased it and resent it.  Then I was told that it was a duplicate comment which it wasn't word for word.  

I'll add it here.  If the original got through, please delete the repetition Foe.  It has been a long time since I have posted anything anywhere.

I will now repost my reply because of that pesky godamn question I forgot about at the bottom.  I said that I will vote for McCain because of the war we face with Islam.  He is the best of the three sorry candadates we have who can deal with it.

It is also good to see Rush coming around to my way of thinking as I have been planning for quite some time to vote for the Hildebeast in our primary.  I want to see the DemocRATS destroy their party like the Republicans have destroyed theirs.  It's high time for some new political parties to form.

Has anyone considered what would happen when B. Hussein Osama (my bad--I just can't picture a US President with that name in a time of war with Islam) Obama's grandmama is kidnapped by jihadists?  They will make demands which must be met, or off goes Granny's muslim head.  That has been common practice on all fronts of this war to kidnap relatives of those who cooperate with the US.  What better target than the "president's" muslim relatives.

Although I detest much of McCain's politics, he is much better on this all pervading issue.  We will still have to fight him on immigration just as we have successfully fought Bush.  We just can't allow the liberal looney left to set public and foreign policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t tell if my thoughts got through or not.  The first time was rejected because forgot to respond to the question at the bottom.  I then rephrased it and resent it.  Then I was told that it was a duplicate comment which it wasn&#8217;t word for word.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll add it here.  If the original got through, please delete the repetition Foe.  It has been a long time since I have posted anything anywhere.</p>
<p>I will now repost my reply because of that pesky godamn question I forgot about at the bottom.  I said that I will vote for McCain because of the war we face with Islam.  He is the best of the three sorry candadates we have who can deal with it.</p>
<p>It is also good to see Rush coming around to my way of thinking as I have been planning for quite some time to vote for the Hildebeast in our primary.  I want to see the DemocRATS destroy their party like the Republicans have destroyed theirs.  It&#8217;s high time for some new political parties to form.</p>
<p>Has anyone considered what would happen when B. Hussein Osama (my bad&#8211;I just can&#8217;t picture a US President with that name in a time of war with Islam) Obama&#8217;s grandmama is kidnapped by jihadists?  They will make demands which must be met, or off goes Granny&#8217;s muslim head.  That has been common practice on all fronts of this war to kidnap relatives of those who cooperate with the US.  What better target than the &#8220;president&#8217;s&#8221; muslim relatives.</p>
<p>Although I detest much of McCain&#8217;s politics, he is much better on this all pervading issue.  We will still have to fight him on immigration just as we have successfully fought Bush.  We just can&#8217;t allow the liberal looney left to set public and foreign policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nikita</title>
		<link>http://foehammer.net/2008/02/limbaugh-says-vote-for-hillary.html#comment-12883</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 04:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://foehammer.net/2008/02/limbaugh-says-vote-for-hillary.html#comment-12883</guid>
					<description>Agreed, Foehammer. For me, all the red flags went up when the Kennedy clan endorsed Obama. And the more he reveals about his plans, the worse it gets. While none of the current candidates are desirable, one thing is clear. Obama is the last person that anyone should consider to defend America or manage the war on terror/islam. Republicans will help themselves with a vote for Hillary on Tuesday. We can deal with McCain later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, Foehammer. For me, all the red flags went up when the Kennedy clan endorsed Obama. And the more he reveals about his plans, the worse it gets. While none of the current candidates are desirable, one thing is clear. Obama is the last person that anyone should consider to defend America or manage the war on terror/islam. Republicans will help themselves with a vote for Hillary on Tuesday. We can deal with McCain later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Patricia</title>
		<link>http://foehammer.net/2008/02/limbaugh-says-vote-for-hillary.html#comment-12876</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://foehammer.net/2008/02/limbaugh-says-vote-for-hillary.html#comment-12876</guid>
					<description>You really know how to scare a girl! I hadn't thought of that one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You really know how to scare a girl! I hadn&#8217;t thought of that one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Foehammer</title>
		<link>http://foehammer.net/2008/02/limbaugh-says-vote-for-hillary.html#comment-12873</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://foehammer.net/2008/02/limbaugh-says-vote-for-hillary.html#comment-12873</guid>
					<description>Perhaps that will be the case, Patricia, but a far scarier scenario for me is a McCain/Obama or Obama/McCain combination, once the race is &lt;em&gt;over&lt;/em&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps that will be the case, Patricia, but a far scarier scenario for me is a McCain/Obama or Obama/McCain combination, once the race is <em>over</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
