Foehammer’s Anvil

7 Responses to “The Obama Deception”

1. 1 R. Hartman  |  
     
   Mar 13th, 2009 at 6:10 pm

   Just now David Crockett posted a response on Dutch site Vrijspreker.nl to my article “Obama, President or Usurpator” with some interesting background and possibly interesting links. Haven’t had time to sort them out yet, but here they are:

   http://www.oilforimmigration.org/facts/?p=1217
   http://defendourfreedoms.us/
   http://www.oilforimmigration.org/facts/?p=1251

   Take care!

2. 2 R. Hartman  |  
   +1 votes
     
   Mar 14th, 2009 at 2:43 pm

   This was posted today on oilforimmigration by ‘rlqretired - Robert Quinn:

   Obama’s demand for secrecy is his Achilles heal which can be exploited without making personal accusatory charges by asking instead a simple question. Why has Obama spent over $800,000 on lawyers to keep hidden important factors in his historical past? What is he hiding?

   Take a lesson from the democrats and their partners, the mainstream media. Simply quote what someone else has charged and then ask the questions “what is he hiding and why” over and over again. The best defense is a good offense.

   It is evident Obama is hiding something seriously critical to his qualification to be president. Much evidence exists, due to this secrecy, that very likely he may not have factually been born in the USA and very likely carries a passport issued by a foreign country since he stated in his book that he traveled to Pakistan and Indonesia, before he ever obtained a US passport. No one in the mainstream media, not even our conservative talk radio hosts will openly discuss or challenge this secrecy.

   A Californian judge has ruled that Obama’s qualifications can only be challenged by members of Congress, not by mere voters, and that they’d have had to do that on Jan 06.
   Congress cannot even do that, they can only impeach, after the Supreme Court has found that Obama’s a fraud. So here’s a judge, ruling against the Constitution!

   They’re now challenging Obama’s qualification without challenging Obama: http://www.oilforimmigration.org/facts/?p=1259#comment-9000

   The beauty of this approach is we don’t have to make egregious charges against Obama. The issue is the denial of due process in the system.

   These sure are interesting times…

3. 3 R. Hartman  |  
   +1 votes
     
   Mar 14th, 2009 at 3:03 pm

   I also found some time to sort out the links I posted earlier. The bottom one exposes MIAC (Missouri Information Analysis Center),

   which describes supporters of presidential candidates Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin, and Bob Barr as “militia” influenced terrorists and instructs the Missouri police to be on the lookout for supporters displaying bumper stickers and other paraphernalia associated with the Constitutional, Campaign for Liberty, and Libertarian parties.

   The MIAC report does not concentrate on Muslim terrorists, but rather on the so-called “militia movement” and conflates it with supporters of Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin, Bob Barr, the so-called patriot movement and other political activist organizations opposed to the North American Union and the New World Order. The MIAC document is a classic guilt by association effort designed to demonize legitimate political activity that stands in opposition to the New World Order and its newly enshrined front man, Barack Obama.

   Worrying indeed…

4. 4 Foehammer  |  
     
   Mar 14th, 2009 at 3:14 pm

   Yes, this is all the talk on the radio here in the USA. “Guilt by association.”

5. 5 R. Hartman  |  
   +1 votes
     
   Mar 14th, 2009 at 6:10 pm

   Foehammer, only tonight I found the time to watch The Obama Deception in full, and I must say, it really spoiled my weekend.
   Sad to see only 16 views in the caption on the right, as this is serious stuff that really should be aired by Fox or such media. Low chance of that though, and you cannot even blame them: their assets would evaporate overnight, like they never existed. Or, more likely: all its staff would be replaced overnight, to make it not too obvious to the general public, a bit like what happened at Popular Mechanics after 911.

   I’ve already mentioned it on Vrijspreker in a comment, but I’ll make a full article on it, on Vrijspreker, HVV (both Dutch), and DutchConcerns as well. This needs to get out; and people should take Michael Badnarik’s messages in mind:
   Where do you draw the line, and will you stick with it?

   The links blow point to Badnarik on Liberty and on The Communist Manifesto. Quote from the latter:

   Did you know you live in a communist country?
   Are you glad to live in a communist country?

   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m68lUe40nXI
   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f9yUaChj5zw

6. 6 Foehammer  |  
     
   Mar 16th, 2009 at 8:54 am

   It is a severely serious situation in the USA. We are at war with ourselves, quite literally. Things will either get worse before they get better, and we wake up and slug it out in a Revolution/Civil War, install proper protectors of our U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights, bring our troops home to protect our own people and borders, arrest and execute a long list of traitors that could quite easily number into the hundreds, even thousands, or it won’t only be Americans that lose, but the entire world.

   What makes this situation that much more difficult is to understand how many people continue to live in denial about the New World Order.

   Denial will not be good enough for much longer.

   “During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.” – George Orwell

7. 7 whuptdue  |  
     
   Mar 23rd, 2009 at 8:49 am

   Twenty-five people at the heart of the meltdown UK Guardian, Monday 26 January 2009 …

   The worst economic turmoil since the Great Depression is not a natural phenomenon but a man-made disaster in which we all played a part. In the second part of a week-long series looking behind the slump, Guardian City editor Julia Finch picks out the individuals who have led us into the current crisis

Leave a Reply