New high resolution videos of the WTC collapses are available thanks to the continuing work of some amazing Danes.
Download them today so you always have a point of reference to see the truth for yourself.
New high resolution videos of the WTC collapses are available thanks to the continuing work of some amazing Danes.
Download them today so you always have a point of reference to see the truth for yourself.

There’s no doubt about it, an explanation would be an appropriate response for all the questions related to that fateful day in American history, those plumes of dust coming out of the building during its collapse can be explained as floors crashing down on themselves, it’s all speculation and no concrete conclusion can be made. A more pertinent concern of mine is the second plane, it has a cylinder of sorts on the underbelly which has absolutely no resemblance of a passenger airplane, and what is the flash projected from the front of the plane a moment before it hits the south tower? If I was leading a movement demanding answers I’d focus on that second plane. There is no escaping the fact that the second plane’s approach is one of the most extraordinarily revealing and incriminating images there are and 911 truthers do themselves no favors at all jumping to conclusions that cannot be made…
Scientists in Denmark disagree with you. Demolition is not even a question in my mind. It happened.
Interesting point about the second aircraft. Just further evidence that a real investigation must be initiated.
I would love to know the truth of that day of infamy but a Danish scientist stating there was a controlled demolition will be countered with another scientist stating the steel collapsed due to fatigue. My point is it’s speculation, but that second plane is what convinces me and if focused upon would provide far greater credibility for the truthers and in doing so would bring down the house of cards…

You can’t “counter” evidence, if it exists. It’s 8 Danish scientists in a study released after 18 months of investigation, BTW.
I fail to understand how you can call residue of nano technology (used to “hide” thermite explosives) in the dust from the falling Twin Towers “speculation”.
I concur, “what the hell was this nanotechnology stuff doing at ground zero?” The anarchist cookbook has this stuff in it, dangerous stuff. It does not ‘prove’ anything, it only provides more questions to be answered. I don’t for a moment deny 911 was an inside job, I’m merely expressing a better tactical approach in confronting the head in the sand stance most people take on the 911 issue. Screaming “911 was an inside job” and “thermite explosives”, will not cut the mustard and the presence of thermite to any layman out there means nothing. You have to cut through the dense forest of the human psyche and produce indisputable ‘evidence’ like the second plane. No matter how stubborn someone might be they cannot say that that plane was a passenger airliner, the rest is speculation…

Excuse me, I had nanotechnology on the brain. The cookbook explains how to combine metal powder (aluminum) and metal oxide rust) in a heated environment to produce a burning substance that can literally burn through anything…

The collapse of the WTC7 was a result of ground settlement. Staged demolition is nothing more than horsepucky.
One more thing Mr. Foehammer, if you have fallen for the “inside job” theory, then ISLAM HAS WON in America! Think about it!
Have you explored the facts as they exist? I think not.