JihadWatcher ambien no rx cod

Archive for the 'Statistics' Category

 

Dallas Morning News: On the governor’s race … (Censored Rebuttal added)

Yesterday early afternoon, I posted a comment in rebuttal to the following part of a longer article/op-ed that seemed to be highlighted Letters to the Editor of the Dallas Morning News. I took especial umbrage with the following observation because it was based on a direct fallacy — that Debra Medina was working with unsound math in her economic plan for Texas. My comment, of course, was not published by the moderator, most likely because I clearly pointed out proof of the fallacy. Here then is the particular letter in question, followed by my original and as yet unpublished comment (emphasis added and links intact and YouTube video embedded for easy viewing) :

Comments

 


 

America’s Impending Master Class Dictatorship

Incredibly detailed article with statistics to support conclusions about our grim future at the rate we are crumbling, fromStewart Dougherty:

Comments

 


 

Medina invited to appear in The Belo Debate

Great news from WFAA.com , Debra Medina’s popularity and chances for greater and much needed Texas and national exposure growing too much to be denied:

DALLAS — Debra Medina — the third candidate running for the GOP nomination for governor along with Gov. Rick Perry and Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison — is being invited to appear in the statewide televised debate sponsored by Belo TV stations in Texas and The Dallas Morning News.
The debate is set for Friday, January 29.
Until now, Medina had not met the criteria to appear in the debate. However, a new Rasmussen Reports poll released Monday shows a shift among likely Texas GOP voters in her favor. The poll of 831 likely voters found:

Comment

 


 

Feeling Broke? You Aren’t Alone.

It seems like a torrent of economic woe is floating across my Twitter account this morning. Here is just a sampling of the articles to peruse that will make you go count your pocket change:

How to Wreck the Credit Markets

State of the states? Broke and going broker

The Recession Is Over, the Depression Just Beginning

The Bonus Boom

Some are some highlights (aka bad news):

Comments

 


 

Fat, Lazy American? Average Work Hours Say Otherwise.

Here’s an eye-opening article and graphic ‘Why Are You at Work Right Now?’ | Ben Paynter | Fast Company:

Comments

 


 

Muslims in America — and those outside that never let us forget

Well, I try hard to not get hostile, but since a certain Turkish Muslim would-be hacker (he really is nothing but an annoyance), continues to remind me of the threat to our future by harassing me, allow me to post this link for Google Maps. You can bookmark it and keep track as the months, years and decades go by.

Mosques

If the points don’t show up for you, simply click on Places of Interests, Places of Worship: Mosques.

That’s a lot of mosques in the U.S. of A. No worries though, right? Merry Christmas!

Comments

 


 

41 Percent of Al Qaeda fighters in Iraq are Saudis

I just heard the most predictable factoid: 41% of Al Qaeda fighters in Iraq are Saudi Arabians. Apparently record keeping by some Al Qaeda higher-ups has been captured by the U.S. military and careful records have revealed a detailed accounting of the social and regional makeup of the Al Qaeda operatives inside Iraq. Many of these Islamic terrorists are being recruited directly off of Islamic college campuses across the Middle East and around the world. This, again, is quite predictable.

Comments

 


 

Islamic Glacier Alert: Islam third-largest religion in Ireland

Even my ancestral home of tiny Ireland is not safe from the Creep of Sharia. From ireland.com:

Muslims are now the third-largest religious group in the State behind Catholic and members of the Church of Ireland, according to Census figures released by the Central Statistics Office today.

There number of people who said their religion was Islam was 32,500 in April 2006, when the Census was conducted across the State. The number represents a 70 per cent increase since 2002.

43 Comments

 


 

Helping TheReligionofPeace.com in order to help ourselves

The Religion of Peace Needs Our Help! No, not that ‘Religion of Peace.’

This one.

An individual that I refuse to name here again (but many of my regular readers will know of and who’s name may be found quoted below) has targeted the gentle folks at The Religion of Peace in an effort to shut down the site just as he attempted to shut down the Anvil and Jihad Watch and others. The results of this phony reverend’s actions provoked a number of internet companies to incorrectly categorize The Religion of Crazy ManPeace. These incorrect categories have caused the site to be listed as a hate site, and consequently blocked by some servers. I know that the accusations made by Sutter, and the various companies are patently false. The Religion of Peace provides accurate facts about Islam – not lies. The site is not racist. Islam is not a race but a political and cultist ideology. The Religion of Peace speaks out against all violence that is directed towards non-Muslims and Muslims alike.

From the editor at TheReligionofPeace.com:

Anyone who has a blog that attempts to defend the west from radical Islam or Marxists knows that they are constantly at risk of being labeled racist, and shut down by individuals and organizations who do not want the truth to be known. The efforts to silence our voices will increase. We are all in this fight together. Therefore, it would be greatly appreciated if all of you would post a notice on your blogs, urging your readers to support The Religion of Peace by sending protest e-mails to the offending companies. Islam and the thought police are coming after all of us. Free speech is in jeopardy. We need to pull together into a strong and united force to combat those who intend to crush us.

I have permission to make this appeal on their behalf and I am happy to do so.

Please write to the email addresses listed below and state clearly that The Religion of Peace – http://www.thereligionofpeace.com (include the url in the e-mails) is against violence, not racist and should be categorized appropriately under labels such as General News, Politics and Religion.

Secure Computing
sites@securecomputing.com

SonicWall
cfssupport@sonicwall.com

SurfControl
customerservice@surfcontrol.com

Here is in-depth analysis of the situation and the problem:

17 Comments

 


 

Muhammad is No 2 in boy’s names in Britain

'Islam will dominate the world'
A very disturbing sign of the times in Eurabia from, ironically, The Times in the UK:

Muhammad is now second only to Jack as the most popular name for baby boys in Britain and is likely to rise to No 1 by next year, a study by The Times has found. The name, if all 14 different spellings are included, was shared by 5,991 newborn boys last year, beating Thomas into third place, followed by Joshua and Oliver.

Scholars said that the name’s rise up the league table was driven partly by the growing number of young Muslims having families, coupled with the desire to name their child in honour of the Prophet.

Muhammad Anwar, Professor of Ethnic Relations at Warwick University, said: “Muslim parents like to have something that shows a link with their religion or with the Prophet.”

Although the official names register places the spelling Mohammed at No 23, an analysis of the top 3,000 names provided by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) puts Muhammad at No 2 once the 14 spellings are taken into account. If its popularity continues — it rose by 12 per cent last year — the name will take the top spot by the end of this year. It first entered the Top 30 in 2000.

The spelling Muhammad, like all transliterations, comes from replacing the Arabic script with what is deemed its closest Latin equivalent. There are many versions in Britain, depending on where the family are from and variations in pronounciation.

Muhammad, which means ‘one who is praiseworthy’, is often given to boys as an honorary prefix and is followed by the name by which they are commonly known. It is regularly cited as the most common name in the world, though there is no concrete evidence.

Mufti Abdul Barkatullah, a former imam at the Finchley mosque in northwest London, said: “Parents who name their son Muhammad believe that the name has an effect on their personality and future characteristics. They are saying that this boy will be of good character.

What’s in a name? If a name truly does have power over the personality of a person, it would account for much; Muhammad was no choir boy.

“Some people may not really understand the history of the Prophet Muhammad and the name but they still want the association so they can be recognised as one of his followers.

Or perhaps they do understand the history of the man and they want to emulate a pedophile and murderer? No wonder the imam, who must be very familiar with the history of Muhammad, wants to leave that door open to conjecture.

“In Arab countries, the name Muhammad is said when you don’t know the name of someone. On the sub-continent, it is different: Muhammad can be used either before or after another name.

“When you get to the UK, it is essentially about translating the sound of the Arabic into English. A nonArab Muslim would have the name ending in -ed while an Arab Muslim would adopt the -ad ending.”

Overall, Muslims account for 3 per cent of the British population, about 1.5 million people. However, the Muslim birthrate is roughly three times higher than the nonMuslim one.

As of this writing, the current U.S. population is 302,017,961. It is believed that roughly 6 million Americans are Muslims. Additionally, we shouldn’t forget to toss in upwards of 20 million illegals. How many illegals are Muslims I do not know, but you can bet more than a few. This puts the percentage of Muslims in the United States at roughly 2%. But don’t rest easy. It is believed that the Muslim population in the U.S.A. already outnumbers our Jewish population, a far older American community. This means the birthrate among Muslims in the United States is just as high as it is in Europe.

Statistics from the ONS show that Muslim households are larger than those headed by someone of another religion. In 2001, the average size of a Muslim household was 3.8 people while a third contained more than five people.

According to data from CACI Information Solutions, men who are named Muhammad are 5x times more likely to go on holiday in Asia and twice as likely to live in Yorkshire than most other people.

Additionally, a man named Muhammad is most likely to be aged between 25 and 34 and to have an average salary of £25,000.

The leading name for girls born to Muslim parents in 2006 was Aisha [Note from Foehammer: see #63 in this link for more information], in 110th place. Its meaning is ‘wife of the Prophet’ or ‘life’.

How do you spell that?

The different spellings of Muhammad in 2006 and the number of occurrences

Mohammed 2,833

Muhammad 1,422

Mohammad 920

Muhammed 358

Mohamed 354

Mohamad 29

Mahammed 18

Mohammod 13

Mahamed 12

Muhammod 9

Muhamad 7

Mohmmed 6

Mohamud 5

Mohammud 5

  • Scholars and imams differ on why there are so many variants of the name
  • Some say it is the result of phonetic translations by Muslims who moved here from abroad. Others say that it is merely down to the personal choice of the parents
  • The most popular names for baby boys in 2006

    1 Jack 6,928
    2 Muhammad (all spellings) 5,991
    3 Thomas 5,921
    4 Joshua 5,808
    5 Oliver 5,208
    6 Harry 5,006
    7 James 4,783
    8 William 4,327
    9 Samuel 4,320
    10 Daniel 4,303
    11 Charlie 4,178
    12 Benjamin 3,778
    13 Joseph 3,755
    14 Callum 3,517
    15 George 3,386
    16 Jake 3,353
    17 Alfie 3,194
    18 Luke 3,108
    19 Matthew 3,043
    20 Ethan 3,020

    All this got me to wondering — why do we not know for sure how many Muslims are in the United States. Well, by law we have no way of knowing for sure. That’s right. I said, by law. Here’s the actual information from the U.S. Census Bureau:

    The U.S. Census Bureau does not collect data on religious affiliation in its demographic surveys or decennial census. Public Law 94-521 prohibits us from asking a question on religious affiliation on a mandatory basis; in some person or household surveys, however, the U.S. Census Bureau may collect information about religious practices, on a voluntary basis. Therefore, the U.S. Census Bureau is not the source for information on religion, nor is the Census Bureau the source for information on religious affiliation.

    So, apparently we have to guess. The “true Muslims” in the United States have yet one more thing to love about a system that they can manipulate to destroy us.

    Sleep well, Jack.

    Comments

     


     

    26% of ‘fighting age’ Muslims in America support Jihad

    Islamberg
    Yes, that’s right, 26% of young adult Muslims wouldn’t mind seeing you blown up “in order to defend Islam from its enemies.” That means that if they could attach a bomb to the Anvil and send these pages sailing into the stratosphere, they’d be all for it.

    Islam has enemies. I’m one of them. I get to be “blowed up good”, too. (My apologies to Second City for that allusion.)

    Now, when you read this New York Post article, pay very close attention to the language coming from the Muslim respondents. I’ve put things in bold-type that should make you read “between the lines”, things that should alarm you in that extra-special alarming way. For instance, Jihadists will always seek to find a mandate to attack enemies in a “defensive” manner, because self-righteous reasons most suit zealots. Look around the world and you will always find Hammas or Hezbollah or al-Qaeda or Iranian mullahs manufacturing reasons for their outrageous actions and terrorism, all in the name of “self-defense”, like when the Iranians kidnapped those British sailors but claimed they were in Iranian waters.

    And even the Muslims that might seem so innocuous today, could so very easily be lying or turned into your enemy tomorrow. Or they are raising your future killers in their homes and in our schools until the “time is right” for the New Caliphate.

    Even more alarming? Look at these percentages and remember that truly tiny minorities in their countries at the time, like Mussolini’s Italy or Hitler’s Germany, turned entire populations towards world war. So, how are we supposed to just ignore far larger ripples in the waters of the USA and say that “we accept Islam” in our midst? I’ve already stated quite clearly how I feel about that idea.

    As you read this next article, decide for yourself what the Muslims in America really mean, what they intend for themselves and how far you might trust them. But here’s one last thing I have to say on all this. I have a barometer for trusting people. It’s quite simple really:

    Would you trust a Muslim to babysit your kids?

    If you answer NO to that question, then you’re already aware of the problems with Islam, and guess what — you’re smarter than you think you are.

    Onward to the latest “good news” from Islam:

    TIME BOMBS IN OUR MIDST By DOUGLAS MONTERO and ANDY SOLTIS

    One out of four young U.S. Muslims believe suicide bombings against innocent civilians are OK to defend Islam, a disturbing new poll revealed yesterday.

    The nationwide survey - one of the most exhaustive ever conducted of American Muslim attitudes - also found widespread doubt that Islamic terrorists carried out the 9/11 attacks.

    But at the same time, three out of four U.S. Muslims are worried about the rise of Islamic extremism around the world - and more than 60 percent are “very concerned” it will grow in America.

    The survey - revealing possible radicalization of homegrown American Muslim youth - included more than 1,000 of the nation’s estimated 2.35 million Muslims and was conducted in English and several foreign languages.

    The most shocking responses came when those surveyed were asked whether suicide bombings and other violence against civilians can be justified “in order to defend Islam from its enemies.”

    Thirteen percent said it can be justified, at least on rare occasions.

    Among those under age 30, that 13 percent doubled to 26 percent.

    Young New York Muslims questioned yesterday said attacks on innocent victims are wrong.

    Ah, yes, but what’s an “innocent victim” in the eyes of “true Muslims”?

    But they said they can understand why foreign Muslims would sacrifice their lives against soldiers in conditions they consider “war.”

    “If it’s for no reason, then it’s no good. If it’s in self-defense, to protect others, then it is right,” said Youns Hussein, a 21-year-old store owner from Brooklyn of Yemeni descent.

    The relatively high poll support for suicide attacks deeply worried many experts yesterday.

    “It is a hair-raising number,” said Radwan Masmoudi, president of the Washington-based Center for the Study of Islam and Democracy.

    The poll question didn’t specify whether the suicide bombings being asked about would be in the United States or in other countries.

    Among the poll’s other disturbing findings was that only 40 percent of U.S. Muslims believe that Arabs carried out the 9/11 attacks. Another 28 percent don’t believe it - and 32 percent said they had no view.

    Among 28 percent who doubted that Arabs were behind the conspiracy, one-fourth claim the U.S. government was responsible.

    Only 26 percent of American Muslims believe the U.S.-led war on terror is a sincere effort to root out international terrorism.

    When it comes to U.S. military operations, three out of four people surveyed said the decision to go to war in Iraq was wrong - and 48 percent said using force in Afghanistan was wrong.

    The poll found homegrown support for al Qaeda. Five percent of those surveyed had a “very favorable” or “somewhat favorable” view of the terrorist group. But 58 percent had a “very unfavorable” opinion.

    And only 3% of Germans were what we would classify as Nazis when the National Socialist German Workers Party first rose to power. Getting the ‘Big Picture’ yet?

    On Atlantic Avenue in Brooklyn, The Post found mixed views among Muslims about suicide bombing and 9/11.

    Mostafa Basraoui, 52, a chef, said his religion does not allow suicide under any circumstances.

    “In Islam, the theory of killing yourself doesn’t exist,” he said.

    But throwing your life away in the cause of Jihad does. This might not amount to literal suicide, but striving to fight in a way that ultimately has no hope of survival surely fits the bill when it comes to Islamic Jihad. Oh, you tricky, tricky Muslim apologists.

    Abderrahim Afennah, 24, a janitor from Morocco who lives in Manhattan, said he was “completely against” suicide attacks “because I consider it terrorism.”

    But he and many others also said Muslims were not behind 9/11.

    “I do believe people who are not Muslims did it intentionally to harm the view people have of Muslims,” he said.

    Ali Ismail, 24, a New-York-born Palestinian who owns two grocery stores, agreed.

    “I think it was the government, President Bush, so that he could have a reason to go into Afghanistan, Iraq - and before you know it he’ll be in Iran,” said Ismail.


    Some suggested Jews carried out the World Trade Center attacks.

    “Some people say it was the Jews. They just wanted to make the Arabs look bad,” one Muslim teenager told The Post.

    Yes, because we all know that the Arab Muslims need help in looking “bad” to the rest of the world….

    A St. John’s University graduate student, who gave his name only as Sam, expressed mixed views on suicide bombing.

    “I don’t know if it’s wrong and I don’t know if it’s right,” he said. “Murder is wrong, but why, when you go to war, it’s all right to kill?”

    He added, “I don’t agree that if you walk into a day-care center and do it” it’s acceptable.

    The Pew research found most Muslims say they have moderate views, middle-class values and are adjusting to America. Seventy-eight percent described themselves as “very happy” with their lives.

    But when asked if they considered themselves an American or a Muslim first, only 28 percent said American.

    *DANGER, WILL ROBINSON* *WARNING, WARNING*

    The survey also found contrasting views of what it’s like to be an American Muslim after Sept. 11, 2001.

    Fifty-three percent said life has become “more difficult” while 40 percent said it hasn’t changed very much.

    And despite reports of anti-Muslim discrimination, 73 percent said they had never been a victim of it in America, the poll found.

    Answer: That’s because those reports are lies perpetuated by organizations like CAIR in order to create more political and legal inroads for the future Islamic agenda.

    The survey found U.S. Muslims are optimistic - even about the Mideast conflict. Sixty-one percent believe a way can be found for both Israel to exist and for the rights of Palestinians to be respected.

    Among other poll findings:

    * 71 percent agree that in America, “most people who want to get ahead can make it if they’re willing to work hard.”

    * 43 percent said U.S. Muslims should “mostly adopt American customs and ways of life.”

    * 72 percent said religion was “very important”.

    * 61 said homosexuality should be discouraged.

    In my opinion, the Muslims to fear are not at all “radicalized” or “extreme” with regards to Islam. The Muslims that use those labels are, again, either lying to hide their true intentions, or they aren’t “good Muslims” themselves, and just as likely spend their secret time viewing porn or drinking alcohol as they might pray five times a day. So, who are you going to believe?

    I’ve learned to trust my instincts on this. Call me crazy, but I want Islam outlawed in the United States and I’ll stick to that idea for now until someone comes up with a better solution.

    Comments

     


     

    35% of Democrats believe George W. had prior knowledge of 9-11

    Rosie O'Donnell - Queen of Talk Show anti-American propaganda
    Being a registered Independent, I have no party affiliation in the United States, but it’s obvious I lean to the Right and not the Left on most subjects. If it isn’t obvious why, then the folks over at Little Green Footballs posted a survey result that should make things clearer. LGF: 35% of Democrats Are Truthers:

    If you need more evidence than a quick look at any left-wing blog that the Democrat Party has become the party of derangement, denial, conspiracy theories and blind hatred, a new Rasmussen poll shows that 35% of Democrats believe Bush knew about the 9/11 attacks in advance.

    Comments

     


     




     
    • Architects & Engineers for 9-11 Truth

    STATS

    • entries   1,076
    • comments   5,964
    • words blogged   578,552
    • words commented   633,593
    • categories   165
    • links   389
    • registered users   477

    Twitter


    Full RSS Feed

    Click to add Foehammer's RSS feed

    Foehammer presents:

    'Refuting Islam'
    An Anvil Original Click to watch the video

    Alex Jones

    Foehammer Poster


    Want one? Foehammer Posters!
    9/11 Health Now
    Architects & Engineers for 9-11 Truth

    Calendar

    March 2010
    M T W T F S S
    « Feb    
    1234567
    891011121314
    15161718192021
    22232425262728
    293031  

    Foehammer's Hot Picks:



    From the Gallery

    Support Them

    Firefox 2

    RSS Entries and RSS Comments 180 queries. 4.9990 seconds.

    Follow me