Here we go again. This story especially irritates me because I happen to love bacon and sausage and Dunkin’ Donuts coffee. I’d love to ask this Muslim shop owner if he serves bagels or are those too Jewish for him, but I digress. From FOXNews.com:
14 CommentsLOS ANGELES — A discrimination lawsuit filed by a Muslim Dunkin’ Donuts franchisee who was not allowed to renew his contract with the chain because of a refusal to sell pork products can proceed, a U.S. appeals court ruled Tuesday.
As promised, here is Banned by PBS: Muslims Against Jihad, in 8 parts. This is must-see viewing, folks. If you come to this site with any interest in gaining insight into the nature of the Islamic threat to the United States and all non-Muslim nations, then this is one of the best documentaries currently available. I would prefer to offer it in higher quality, but I did not capture these segments myself; beggars can’t be choosers.
While I wait for what I hope will be the inevitable emergence of a YouTube-style video from the FOXNews airing of ‘Muslims against Jihad’ from Sunday night, I have a few quick thoughts on what I saw.
The number one conclusion is nothing new for me, but simply calcified even further: Saudi Arabia is one of the top three enemies of the United States and Western nations. It doesn’t matter where you rank them in that top three, it simply matters that they are there. The Saudis are the greatest agents of Sharia on the planet. They also control the two holiest cities of Islam, which gives them unprecedented power in the Islamic world. Combine that with their vast oil revenues and you can’t be blind to the resulting threat.
Saudi Arabia must be stopped, contained and brought to heel. It’s that simple. To continue to appease them, as the Bush family has, is no longer acceptable on any level.
The other most startling moment that came in the film for me was one that I had seen before on C-Span, so I was happy to see it repeated knowing that this time the moment will be caught for online viewing by some anti-jihad blogger somewhere. This was a snippet from an interview with the infamous Islamist cleric-in-exile from the United Kingdom, Omar Bakri. In the first 10 minute segment of the program, Omar Bakri stated this:
“The only way you can stop us, by give up your democracy. If you give up democracy and Freedom of Speech, and start to stop us and ban us the way you started to do, that the way you can stop us. But that mean we succeed. We say to the people: ‘You see? Democracy-Hypocrisy. We have always said so.’ You do not believe in democracy.”
See? The Islamists are not stupid at all. They are manipulating Western laws and constitutional rights against us. By hiding behind the veil of a benevolent-religion-gone-wrong, they keep our leaders off-balance, they garner sympathy from the public and they barter for time. The more time they get in our societies, the more followers they gain, the more power they amass and then the harder they will be to expel. It’s really that simple.
Bakri proverbially thumbs his nose at all of us in the West and he literally grins while doing it.
I also have this thought: at least one of the “moderate” Muslims in the film basically said that we need “moderates” in the U.S.A. because if these kinds of Muslims leave, the jihadists and Islamists will remain “…and good luck with them.” This “moderate” Muslim had a point, but don’t be lulled into compliance with that goal. You see, I’m still adamantly for outlawing Islam. If we look to “moderate” Muslims for help then what are we doing that’s more dangerous? We will be accepting Islam; giving validation to a false religion.
You might ask, “Foehammer, how are you so sure that Islam is false?”
“The same way I know the moon is not made of green cheese. I’ve learned enough about the moon to put aside the myths and accept the reality.”
Once you take the time to examine the mind and life of Muhammad, once you examine Islam and the Qur’an and the history of the Middle East both before and after the birth of Islam, you will not come away with lingering doubts as long as you remain objective and logical. There will be no doubt in your mind that if what Islam claims is all true, then the Creator must be a schizophrenic and a sadist. And Muhammad had all his problems answered by Allah quite conveniently — when he wasn’t talking to Satan, which he actually “admitted” to on at least one infamous occasion (i.e. the Satanic Verses), but obviously talking to Satan was another matter of convenience.
I will post video footage from both ‘Islam vs Islamists’ and ‘Muslims against Jihad’ when I find it.
Related Source: World Magazine
13 Comments
I just received the following alert from reader/contributor, A Plague On Both Houses. I’m not sure if this will be an actual airing of documentary footage from the film ‘Islam vs Islamists’, but it still sounds like an important viewing opportunity. Should anyone reading here at the Anvil get more details on Saturday’s scheduled production, please post a comment here or contact me so that I may update this entry.
From FoxNews:
4 CommentsBanned By PBS: Muslims Against Jihad — Sat 9p/3a EST
It’s a riveting documentary about moderate Muslims fighting jihadists who want us dead … but was it stifled by liberal bias?
While watching a debate on FoxNews this morning I was amazed to hear talk radio host Mark Williams actually say:
“[Islam] is a 7th century death cult. It’s violent by nature.”
His starkly truthful response was a rebuke of the other speaker in the debate that kept saying over and over again that “Islam is not violent by nature.” I must applaud Mark Williams for having the brass to actually say it like it is. Bravo, sir!
And what was the debate about? From The Buffalo News comes one of many reports today on the move to remove Islamic texts from prison systems. It’s a move that should extend all the way to the Qur’an itself if it does not. On the specifics I’m not yet clear.
I’m in disagreement with officials making this an issue of equivalence by removing Christian and Jewish texts too (again, no mention of the Bible itself being removed), but this is a step in the right direction on the Al-Qaeda and jihadists recruiting fronts, so we should take what we can get at this point when it comes to proper enforcement.
NEW YORK — Inmates at the federal prison camp in Otisville were stunned when they entered the chapel library on Memorial Day: Hundreds of books had disappeared from the shelves.
The removal of the books is occurring nationwide. It is part of a long-delayed federal directive, ordered after the Sept. 11 attacks in 2001, designed to prevent radical religious texts, specifically Islamic ones, from falling into the hands of violent inmates.
Three inmates from Otisville filed a lawsuit over the policy, saying their Constitutional rights were violated. They say all religions were affected — Islamic prayer books, Christian books and ancient Jewish texts were among those removed.
Inmate Douglas Kelly, who described himself as a representative of the prison’s Muslim community, complained of “a denial of our First Amendment rights.”
He said books on Islam already were among the smallest religious collections in the library and had been trimmed in half in the Memorial Day removal.
He said most of the Islamic books which disappeared involved the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad and contained instructions on how Muslims are supposed to pray and how to follow diet and religious laws, along with the statements of religious scholars.
“A lot of what we are missing were definitely prayer books or prayer guides and religious laws on the part of the Muslim faith,” he said.
But the government stressed that the new rules don’t entirely clear the shelves of prison chapel libraries.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian Feldman told U.S. District Judge Laura Taylor Swain that prison libraries limited the number of books for each religion to between 100 and 150 books under the new rules. But he said officials would expand the number after a second look at the list of permitted books.
Feldman said the order to remove books stems from an April 2004 Department of Justice review of how prisons choose Muslim religious services providers. It is not exactly clear why it took so long for the order to take effect, but prison officials needed time to pore over a long list of books and determine what’s acceptable.
I’d like to remind these prisoners that they gave up many basic rights the day they entered the prison system. They especially do not have the right to metamorphose themselves into violent jihadists ready for action when they are finally released!
I am left to believe that the Qur’an is still considered “acceptable”. This is, of course, a blunder but this event opens the door an inch towards outlawing Islam in the United States. It’s a start.
2 Comments
I thought someone was joking when I saw this information for the first time this morning on FOXNews as I was making my breakfast. Sadly, it is true. Amazingly, we replace a capable and classically American bulldog like Bolton with — a Muslim.
6 CommentsPro-Israel activist Jan Markell says she cannot understand why there is has been virtually no coverage of President Bush’s recent announcement that he is appointing a Muslim to the be the next U.S. ambassador to the United Nations.
Well, I have to laugh right now. I just started messing with Twitter last night — a free web application that acts like text messaging and IM status monitor combined– and lo and behold, while I’m sitting here this afternoon tweaking Twitter and the rest of the recent changes to my blog layout, FOXNews features a report on, yep, Twitter!
In case you want to find out what this craziness is all about besides stalking people online, here are a couple of links that should get you started:
2 Comments
Foehammer's Anvil is powered by 
and a heavily modified 
Current style is Anvil 2.0 | Copyright © 2004-2010, FoehammerTM
Podcasts Archive
