JihadWatcher ambien no rx cod

Tag Archive for 'tancredo'

 

Tancredo’s threat to bomb Muslim holy sites would work for Ender

By now you’ve heard about this via CNN.com:

Colorado Rep. Tom Tancredo’s campaign stood by his assertion that bombing holy Muslim sites would serve as a good “deterrent” to prevent Islamic fundamentalists from attacking the United States, his spokeswoman said Friday.

“This shows that we mean business,” said Bay Buchanan, a senior Tancredo adviser. “There’s no more effective deterrent than that. But he is open-minded and willing to embrace other options. This is just a means to deter them from attacking us.”

On Tuesday, Tancredo warned a group of Iowans that another terrorist attack would “cause a worldwide economic collapse.” IowaPolitics.com recorded his comments.

“If it is up to me, we are going to explain that an attack on this homeland of that nature would be followed by an attack on the holy sites in Mecca and Medina,” Tancredo said.
“That is the only thing I can think of that might deter somebody from doing what they would otherwise do. If I am wrong, fine, tell me, and I would be happy to do something else. But you had better find a deterrent, or you will find an attack.”

Tom Casey, a deputy spokesman for the State Department, told CNN’s Elise Labott that the congressman’s comments were “reprehensible” and “absolutely crazy.” Tancredo was widely criticized in 2005 for making a similar suggestion.

And if you look at the comments here and here, you will note that 85% of the respondents seem glued to the idea of a “waving flowers in the meadows” approach to Islam.

Yeah, right, like that’s ever worked.

I am a big fan of author Orson Scott Card. Card is one of the best writers that the United States has ever produced and he lives comfortably on the east coast. You might recognize the name of his best known book which has spawned a long series of sequels, Ender’s Game.

Ender's Game

Well, it just so happens that the last time Tancredo made a similar suggestion as in the above news report, I made this comment on Jihad Watch on July 18, 2005:

Yada, yada, yada.

I can promise you — if even one WMD goes off in the United States, the bombing of Mecca would just be the start.

How much patience do you all really think the United States has as a people? It is great but finite.

A nuclear attack on American soil or any American possession would ignite a conflict that hasn’t been seen on this planet since WW2 — and Islam has been asking for a reckoning for too long. I say if they are truly barbaric enough to strike at the one Superpower with such ferocity, then we will be well within our rights to exact a punishment that should be sufficient enough to make them wish they’d never been born.

(Warning Spoiler Ahead for those who might want to read Orson Scott Card’s writings) There’s a book called ‘Ender’s Game’ — in that book the hero, Ender, is confronted by a vicious bully that just simply will never give the hero peace or a sense of security. This bully sadly underestimates the hero, thinking him weak-willed and cowardly. Ultimately the hero strikes out brutally and swiftly, killing his enemy. And the reasoning is simple — you don’t just maim a deadly enemy. You destroy it so it can never seek you out again or go after your friends or loved ones. You cut out the cancer, basically.

(Ender, Book 8)Surely not by coincidence, a few months back I completed reading another part of the Ender Series published in 2005, ‘Shadow of the Giant’, and wouldn’t you know it, when I thought I was sitting down to get away from the drudgery and evil of Islam in my spare time, I was confronted inside the covers of that book by Islam! Chapter Twelve is even titled ‘Allahu Akbar’.

Without giving away the plot of any part of the Ender Series, I can say this much, and get to what I have been leading up to in a long-winded fashion. In the future of our Earth that is the setting for the geo-political science fiction of the Ender Universe, Mecca and Medina have long ago been reduced to nuclear-radiated slag heaps and this epiphany is unveiled for the reader in ‘Shadow of the Giant’ without fanfare or comment; simply matter-of-fact.

Tancredo is not crazy or stupid. He is brave and wise, and we would do well to stop allowing members of the State Department to toss derisive remarks at him as if he is some childish lunatic, especially while they are under the sway of a President George W. Bush, who apparently doesn’t have the sense, courage or brains enough to launch the overdue series of attacks upon Iran’s nuclear ambitions to prevent any such need for retaliation such as Tancredo describes or author Card predicts.

Frankly, to everyone that believes it insane and wrong to warn the Islamic world that we would indeed strike back at Medina and Mecca in the event of a WMD attack upon the United States of America, I have but this to say: you are spineless and stupid and you should also return your paychecks if you are on the U.S. government’s payroll.

I’m sorry, but did you expect me to be nice about this and just fall in line? You know me better than that by now.

And yes, I do happen to cast a long shadow. I love that bit of irony this evening.

24 Comments

 


 

Why the Democrats shouldn’t win the White House

After watching part of the second Republican debate last night, things started to become very clear for me on at least one point: the Democrats shouldn’t win the White House.

Why?

The root answer is very simple, but still deserves explanation, so I won’t drag this out longer than necessary, but I will get into some detail: The only candidates that are talking about “Global Jihad” and “Radical Islam” and “Immigration” as being the most important issues reside on the Right, not the Left.

In addition to that, even Texas Congressman Ron Paul, who made his points last night on Iraq being a quagmire, wasn’t completely wrong. He’s wrong in reasoning that the “enemy” would have left us alone years ago, or would leave us in peace today if we suddenly became more empathetic to them and hadn’t ever dropped a bomb in Iraq prior to 9-11 or afterwards, but he’s not wrong in understanding that moving out of Iraq may very well be in our best interest. Colorado Congressman Tancredo, on the other hand, said basically the same thing as Ron Paul when it comes to leaving Iraq, but in less controversial language because Tancredo doesn’t perceive the United States as “starting” this war between the forces of Islam in the Middle East and the West. He simply sees what I and others (like Hugh Fitzgerald over at Jihad Watch) see — that trying to force a victory in Iraq by old rules isn’t going to work, and it if does, the cost will be too great in American, British and other Allied lives. And anyway, the Islamists aren’t ever going to leave us alone. They want the United States. They want Europe. The evidence of this pervades the news every single day.

The Republican candidates to watch right now are Romney and Giulliani. McCain won’t win.

John McCain means well, and I supported him strongly back in 2000, but I’ve since come to believe several things about John today. One thing I see is that he’s too old for the job ahead. He’s lost steam in his current campaign and it’s only going to get harder for him as the other candidates get stronger and more face time and as the really big dogs eventually enter the race (i.e. Fred Thompson, Newt). The biggest factor against McCain now though is that he’s simply not talking the strongest language on the War on Terror. He’s not willing to confront Islam like I feel Romney and Giuliani would. McCain uses terms like “radical Islamic extremists” and for anyone that’s been here long enough should know, I steer clear of such apologetic slogans when I talk about the Islamic enemy. There’s nothing “radical” about “good Muslims”, there’s simply something “lazy” and “disingenuous” about “moderate” ones.

McCain is also lackluster when it comes to Illegal Immigration and I can’t let that slide. I have a long memory.

And there’s something bigger about McCain that bothers me, something I can’t quite put my finger on but that I perceive none-the-less: I think that the former backers of Bush are now behind McCain. I know that this might seem crazy, but he’s the most likely dog for their “status quo” mentality. Yes, the very same “rich guys” that put out virulent campaign ads that smeared McCain back when he first attempted to get the Republican nomination back in 2000 are now most likely to be behind him for President before they’d support any of the other current contenders. I don’t want any strong Bush backers back in power in Washington with their fingers in the pie and their lobbyists at work. Sorry. It’s time to move on and it’s certainly time to cut ties with Saudi Arabian oil.

As for who looks the best right now? Once again, the surprise is Mitt Romney.


Mitt Romney is like the “ice-man” of the current campaign. He’s never ruffled, never flustered, never off-message and never breaks a sweat. He looks like an American President. The man is simply a professional campaigner, no bones about it. He’s come from relative obscurity to the front of the polls in a very short time and I’ve been admiring his language. He is the only person in the campaign other than Tom Tancredo that is currently addressing “Global Jihad” and “Illegal Immigration” as being his primary concerns. And he’s extremely consistent on these topics. Now, this is a fairly big deal coming from me, because I’m a big fan of Rudy Giuliani from back when I was going through the 9-11 experience with rest of the country. And honestly, I’m starting to think that the idea of a “Rudy McRomney” ticket really isn’t just a funny slogan, though I’m thinking that leaving out the “Mac” might make a better burger. But Romney has gotten my full attention thus far.

Now the truly ironic part here is that Romney is a Mormon — a branch of Christianity that by all rights is no-less cultist in its origins than Islam is. However, the big difference is, as I’ve pointed out in other discussions about attempts at equivalence between Islam and Christianity, is that whether or not some of us might have misgivings about the realities behind Mormonism, the fact remains that Jesus Christ and his teachings are the foundation of the Mormon Church, and Muhammad is the center of Islam. Perhaps it’s Fate at work that two heretical off-shoots from Judeo-Christian belief systems would now be possibly running straight at each other like steaming trains. Because, as you must see, it’s far better to have someone in Washington who believes in the peaceful and gentle “spirit” of Jesus than it ever would be to have a Muslim in charge. I think Romney gets that message loud and clear. He might not ever be able to wipe away the stigma of Joseph Smith and Brigham Young from Mormon history, but he certainly can prove that he’s a follower of the ideals of Jesus Christ, and that my friends, is never a bad thing.

No person needs to believe or disbelieve in a religion, God, Heaven or Hell to come to understand that the philosophies of Jesus Christ are worth emulating and that those of Muhammad are worth defeating.

The Democrats don’t have anything like we see on the Republican ticket. They don’t have any bulls in the ring or persons of solid values. They don’t have the fight, or the real conviction to fight against the Islamic threat. And this, gentle readers, is why the Democrats shouldn’t win in 2008.

Now, it’s up to us to make sure that the right people get into the White House. At this point it’s far too early to declare who I’m fully backing and hopefully most of you are still on the fence watching, too. But I hope that what I’ve written today helps you decide what you should be looking for. We have got to stop Islam from strangling the United States with its hidden agendas and openly hostile terrorist acts, and we also must seal the borders tightly against further incursions of illegals. These are the two greatest issues on the table, and anyone that says otherwise is a fool.

So, please, put aside some of your preconceived notions about these candidates and some of your own bias and listen to what they are saying. Listen to the issues and find those voices that ring truthful. And in the next few months, when you hear more of what I’m talking about today coming through those voices, you’ll know who to pull that lever for when the time comes. The very future of the country depends on our wise choice. You know it as well as I do.

24 Comments

 


 

Endorsement for 3rd District Congress

I’ve reviewed the record of John Jacob. He’s not a lawyer. That’s a plus! He’s a Reagan conservative. Another plus! He’s got the right ideas on Immigration and National Defense. Plus, plus!

Election in Utah is coming up fast: June 27th. Let’s start the ball rolling towards November, shall we? Elect this man.

Some other names to remember in upcoming elections:

Tancredo.

Goldwater.

Weldon.

I’ll have more endorsements as the year unravels. (It’s hard to find the right people!)

Comment

 


 




 

STATS

  • entries   1,076
  • comments   5,964
  • words blogged   578,552
  • words commented   633,593
  • categories   165
  • links   389
  • registered users   477

Twitter


Full RSS Feed

Click to add Foehammer's RSS feed

Foehammer presents:

'Refuting Islam'
An Anvil Original Click to watch the video

Alex Jones

Foehammer Poster


Want one? Foehammer Posters!
9/11 Health Now
Architects & Engineers for 9-11 Truth

Calendar

March 2010
M T W T F S S
« Feb    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Foehammer's Hot Picks:



From the Gallery

Support Them

Get Thunderbird!

RSS Entries and RSS Comments 131 queries. 2.6910 seconds.

Follow me